2022
Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Protocols
Butcher N, Monsour A, Mew E, Chan A, Moher D, Mayo-Wilson E, Terwee C, Chee-A-Tow A, Baba A, Gavin F, Grimshaw J, Kelly L, Saeed L, Thabane L, Askie L, Smith M, Farid-Kapadia M, Williamson P, Szatmari P, Tugwell P, Golub R, Monga S, Vohra S, Marlin S, Ungar W, Offringa M. Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Protocols. JAMA 2022, 328: 2345-2356. PMID: 36512367, DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.21243.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGuidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports
Butcher N, Monsour A, Mew E, Chan A, Moher D, Mayo-Wilson E, Terwee C, Chee-A-Tow A, Baba A, Gavin F, Grimshaw J, Kelly L, Saeed L, Thabane L, Askie L, Smith M, Farid-Kapadia M, Williamson P, Szatmari P, Tugwell P, Golub R, Monga S, Vohra S, Marlin S, Ungar W, Offringa M. Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports. JAMA 2022, 328: 2252-2264. PMID: 36511921, DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.21022.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCONSORT 2010 statementClinical trialsConsensus meetingTrial reportsTrial outcomesReporting outcomesReporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 statementTrial resultsElectronic database searchReporting of outcomesPerson consensus meetingCochrane Methodology RegisterGrey literature searchReference list searchesPrespecified analysisSecondary outcomesConsensus-based standardsDelphi survey processConsolidated StandardsDelphi votingTreatment groupsOutcome selectionFurther evaluationEvidence-informed decisionLiterature search
2020
Outcome reporting recommendations for clinical trial protocols and reports: a scoping review
Butcher N, Mew E, Monsour A, Chan A, Moher D, Offringa M. Outcome reporting recommendations for clinical trial protocols and reports: a scoping review. Trials 2020, 21: 620. PMID: 32641085, PMCID: PMC7341657, DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04440-w.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsClinical Trials as TopicConsensusEndpoint DeterminationHumansInformation DisseminationResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeConceptsClinical trial protocolTrial protocolTrial outcomesStandard Protocol ItemsReporting of outcomesElectronic bibliographic database searchConsensus-based guidanceFull-text screeningGrey literature searchInterventional trialsResultsIn totalClinical trialsBibliographic database searchConsolidated StandardsProtocol ItemsCandidate itemsOutcome selectionAbstract screeningLiterature searchOutcomesResearch wasteNeurodevelopmental outcome descriptions in cohorts of extremely preterm children
Ding S, Mew E, Chee-A-Tow A, Offringa M, Butcher N, Moore G. Neurodevelopmental outcome descriptions in cohorts of extremely preterm children. Archives Of Disease In Childhood - Fetal And Neonatal Edition 2020, 105: fetalneonatal-2019-318144. PMID: 31932362, DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318144.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCohort studyCerebral palsyCognitive functionNeurodevelopmental outcomesOutcome selectionProspective cohort studyLong-term followOutcome descriptionsCompleteness of outcomeCompleteness of reportingOutcome assessorsPreterm infantsPreterm birthOutcome definitionsPreterm childrenOutcome reportingPalsyOutcomesInfantsChildrenReportingPretermStudy resultsCohortFollow
2019
Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT)
Butcher NJ, Monsour A, Mew EJ, Szatmari P, Pierro A, Kelly LE, Farid-Kapadia M, Chee-a-tow A, Saeed L, Monga S, Ungar W, Terwee CB, Vohra S, Fergusson D, Askie LM, Williamson PR, Chan AW, Moher D, Offringa M. Improving outcome reporting in clinical trial reports and protocols: study protocol for the Instrument for reporting Planned Endpoints in Clinical Trials (InsPECT). Trials 2019, 20: 161. PMID: 30841935, PMCID: PMC6404348, DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3248-0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsClinical trialsTrial protocolTrial reportsExpert consensus meetingClinical trial reportsCONSORT reporting guidelinesIntegrated knowledge translation approachSystematic review authorsKnowledge translation approachReview authorsConsensus-based standardsPatient outcomesConsensus meetingDiverse disease areasInternational Delphi studyTrial designGuideline developersGuideline developmentCONSORT extensionDelphi studyTrial outcomesEQUATOR NetworkCandidate outcomesTrialsPoor quality outcomesGuidance for reporting outcomes in clinical trials: scoping review protocol
Butcher NJ, Mew EJ, Saeed L, Monsour A, Chee-A-Tow A, Chan AW, Moher D, Offringa M. Guidance for reporting outcomes in clinical trials: scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2019, 9: e023001. PMID: 30782872, PMCID: PMC6377514, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023001.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2018
Defining and measuring health equity effects in research on task shifting interventions in high-income countries: a systematic review protocol
Orkin AM, McArthur A, McDonald A, Mew EJ, Martiniuk A, Buchman DZ, Kouyoumdjian F, Rachlis B, Strike C, Upshur R. Defining and measuring health equity effects in research on task shifting interventions in high-income countries: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2018, 8: e021172. PMID: 30068611, PMCID: PMC6074666, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021172.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPROGRESS-Plus frameworkHealth equityHigh-income countriesBaseline statusHealth inequitiesOpen-access peer-reviewed publicationHigh-income settingsHealth equity effectsSystematic review protocolQuality of reportingDisease burdenEligible studiesEffective treatmentPeer-reviewed publicationsAcademic conference presentationsHealth disadvantageSystematic reviewNarrative synthesisAbstract screeningReview protocolIntervention impactManual searchingInterventionHuman subjectsDuplicate titles
2016
Health effects of training laypeople to deliver emergency care in underserviced populations: a systematic review protocol
Orkin AM, Curran JD, Fortune MK, McArthur A, Mew EJ, Ritchie SD, Van de Velde S, VanderBurgh D. Health effects of training laypeople to deliver emergency care in underserviced populations: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2016, 6: e010609. PMID: 27194315, PMCID: PMC4874171, DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010609.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsLow-resource settingsEmergency care trainingUnderserviced populationsCare trainingDisease Control Priorities ProjectHealth effectsEmergency care capacityEmergency care interventionsEmergency health conditionsCommunity health effectsSystematic review protocolFull-text reviewFormal ethical approvalKnowledge translation strategiesElectronic bibliographic databasesCommunity health benefitsGrey literature sourcesCare interventionsCare capacityEmergency careEthical approvalPeer-reviewed publicationsPerformance biasAttrition biasSystematic review