It is estimated that more than $200 billion is spent on biomedical research every year. The return on that investment is too low, agree a group of experts who gathered at the Yale School of Public Health to discuss reproducibility and transparency in research last week.
Organizing Committee
- John Ioannidis, Co-Director Meta-research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS)
- Vasilis Vasiliou, Chair, Environmental Health Sciences Yale School of Public Health
- Joshua Wallach, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Collaboration for Research Integrity and Transparency (CRIT) and the Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (CORE), Yale-New Haven, Hospital
Tentative Schedule - April 16, 2018
9:00 AM: Opening remarks by Vasilis Vasiliou
Department Chair and Professor, Yale School of Public Health
Yale University
9:10 AM: Welcome address from Sten Vermund
Dean, Professor of Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health
Yale University
9:20 AM: Improving Research Practices: Overview
Presented by
John Ioannidis
Professor of Medicine, of Health Research and Policy, of Biomedical Science, and of Statistics, and Co-Director of the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS)
Stanford University
9:50 AM: Statistical and Data Errors: Prevent, Detect, Admit, Correct
Presented by
David Allison
Provost Professor of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dean and Provost Professor, Bloomington School of Public Health
Indiana University
10:10 Morning Break
10:30 AM:
Exploring new types of research indicators based on open source information
Presented by
Kevin Boyack
President of SciTech Strategies, Inc.
10:50 AM: Computational Reproducibility
Presented by
Victoria Stodden
Associate Professor, School of Information Sciences, The iSchool at Illinois
University of Illinois
11:10 Open Discussion with Harlan Krumholz, John Ioannidis, and Joshua Wallach (50 minutes)
Harlan Krumholz
Harold H. Hines, Jr. Professor of Medicine (Cardiology) and Professor in the Institute for Social and Policy Studies, of Investigative Medicine and of Public Health (Health Policy); Director, Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital; Co-Director, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Yale University
12:00 Lunch
12:45: What resources can Schools of Public Health utilize to promote transparency and reproducibility?
Joshua Wallach, Vasilis Vasiliou, and John Ioannidis
Moderators
Library Resources (15 minutes)
Kate Nyhan, MLS
Research and Education Librarian, Cushing/Whitney Medical Library
Yale University
Center for Open Science (15 minutes)
Matthew Spitzer
Community Manager, Center for Open Science
The Yale University Open Data Access (YODA) Project (15 minutes)
Joseph Ross
Associate Professor of Medicine (General Medicine), Institute for Social and Policy Studies, and of Public Health (Health Policy)
Yale University
30-minute discussion
2:00 PM: How should faculty/graduate students learn about transparency and reproducibility?
Melinda Pettigrew, Associate Dean, Yale School of Public Health, and Vasilis Vasiliou
Moderators
Donna Spiegelman
Professor of Epidemiologic Methods, Harvard School of Public Health
Harvard University
Limor Peer
Associate Director for Research, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Office of the Provost
Yale University
David Jett
Program Director, Division of Translational Research
Director, NIH Countermeasures Against Chemical Threats (CounterACT) Program
David Allison
Provost Professor of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dean and Provost Professor Bloomington University
Indiana University
Open discussion
3:15-3.30: break
3:30: Are there uniform policies regarding the expectation for research quality that Schools of Public Health can adopt?
Open discussion with all participants (John Ioannidis, Vasilis Vasiliou, Sten Vermund, Joshua Wallach, moderators)
- What can be done to promote reproducible practices in schools of public health?
- What are resources that can be shared?
- What are practices that can be widely endorsed?
- What are obstacles and how can they be overcome?
- What structures need to be in place, perhaps be created?
- What research or observatory-type of input would be useful for guidance?
- Are there specific assessments or studies that would be worthwhile conducting across multiple schools of public health?
4:20-4:40 PM Session 5: Action items to summarize
rev. 4.10.2018