Infectious–disease experts, zoologists and biostatisticians from Cambridge to Kazakhstan convened at the Yale School of Public Health April 3 and 4 for its first conference on zoonoses, infectious diseases with the potential to spread from animals to humans. Rabies, Lyme disease, Ebola virus and avian flu were just a few of the illnesses discussed over the two days, through the lenses of both forecast modeling and surveillance and intervention.
“We’re very committed to an inter–disciplinary approach,” Dean Paul Cleary told dozens of scientists and students gathered in Winslow Auditorium. “We need experts across the spectrum of science to build our work against the spread of infectious diseases.”
Durland Fish, professor in the division of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, organized the conference to foster a cross–disciplinary approach to tracking and controlling zoonoses on a global scale. Fish also serves as director of Yale’s Institute for Biospheric Studies Center for EcoEpidemiology, which sponsors forums on topics that integrate ecology with epidemiology to address issues pertaining to environmental and human health. “The overall objective was to bridge ecology with epidemiology, and we’ve put some planks in that bridge over these two days,” said Fish.
Maria Diuk–Wasser, assistant professor in the division of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, presented research that pointed to climate as a reliable predictor of the risks of contracting Lyme disease, the U.S.’s most frequently–reported vector–borne disease in humans. (Vector–borne zoonoses are transmitted through invertebrates such as insects.) Diuk–Wasser’s research identified two main areas of Lyme–causing ticks, known as Ixodes scapularis nymphs: the Northeast and Upper Midwest. Based on tick samples and weather–station data in 304 locations, a climate–based prediction of the nymphs’ population density emerged to help estimate the risk of humans acquiring different strains of the disease in different severities. “Our model can be used by the public, physicians and public–health agencies to better target Lyme disease prevention and control efforts,” said Diuk–Wasser.