2021
Gender, Sperm Troubles, and Assisted Reproductive Technologies
Inhorn M. Gender, Sperm Troubles, and Assisted Reproductive Technologies. 2021, 126-143. DOI: 10.1017/9781108980548.008.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchPhilosophy of scienceHistory of artReproductive technologiesImplications of epigeneticsIslamic studiesPolitical theoryCategories of analysisImportance of genderCarl DjerassiMedical anthropologyCultural studiesGender studiesSexualized violenceAssisted Reproductive TechnologyUniversity of CambridgePhilosophyTribal communitiesRespective fieldsExtraordinary arrayGenderPsychoanalysisAnthropologyScholarsScienceViolence
2008
Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Culture Change
Inhorn M, Birenbaum-Carmeli D. Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Culture Change. Annual Review Of Anthropology 2008, 37: 177-196. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085230.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchThe “Iranian ART Revolution”Infertility, Assisted Reproductive Technology, and Third-Party Donation in the Islamic Republic of Iran
Abbasi-Shavazi M, Inhorn M, Razeghi-Nasrabad H, Toloo G. The “Iranian ART Revolution”Infertility, Assisted Reproductive Technology, and Third-Party Donation in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal Of Middle East Women's Studies 2008, 4: 1-28. DOI: 10.2979/mew.2008.4.2.1.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchGamete donationOnly Muslim countrySunni Islamic worldThird-party donationReproductive technologiesReligious authorityDonor technologiesIslamic worldMuslim countriesMoral consequencesIranian artIranian societyCivil lawIslamic RepublicDonor gametesAssisted Reproductive TechnologyExperience of infertilityPatriarchal relationsAssisted reproductionResponsibilityWomen's livesSocial pressureRevolutionLawAuthorities
1970
Islam, Assisted Reproductive Technologies, and the Middle Eastern State
Inhorn M. Islam, Assisted Reproductive Technologies, and the Middle Eastern State. Babylon Nordisk Tidsskrift For Midtøstenstudier 1970 DOI: 10.5617/ba.4277.Peer-Reviewed Original Research