2014
Lower Pitch Is Larger, Yet Falling Pitches Shrink
Eitan Z, Schupak A, Gotler A, Marks LE. Lower Pitch Is Larger, Yet Falling Pitches Shrink. Experimental Psychology 2014, 61: 273-284. PMID: 24351984, DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000246.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2011
Flavor-intensity perception: Effects of stimulus context
Marks LE, Shepard TG, Burger K, Chakwin EM. Flavor-intensity perception: Effects of stimulus context. Physiology & Behavior 2011, 105: 443-450. PMID: 21930139, PMCID: PMC3225720, DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.08.039.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2006
Anxiety sensitivity and auditory perception of heartbeat
Pollock R, Carter A, Amir N, Marks L. Anxiety sensitivity and auditory perception of heartbeat. Behaviour Research And Therapy 2006, 44: 1739-1756. PMID: 16513082, DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.013.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAnxiety sensitivityElevated false alarm rateFear-relevant cuesAuditory perceptionThreat signalsAutonomic arousalDetection paradigmAS individualsPanic disorderPanic patientsPanic attacksLow abilityPerceptionTaskIndividualsCardiac stimuliArousalCuesGreater propensityFalse alarm rateBackground noiseFearStimuliAbilityNormal heartbeats
2004
Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching
Bartoshuk LM, Duffy VB, Green BG, Hoffman HJ, Ko C, Lucchina LA, Marks LE, Snyder DJ, Weiffenbach JM. Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching. Physiology & Behavior 2004, 82: 109-114. PMID: 15234598, DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.02.033.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchThe Temporal Automated System for Taste Experiments (TASTE)
Ashkenazi A, Fritz M, Buckley J, Marks L. The Temporal Automated System for Taste Experiments (TASTE). Behavior Research Methods 2004, 36: 83-88. PMID: 15190702, DOI: 10.3758/bf03195552.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2002
Visual Marking: Selective Attention to Asynchronous Temporal Groups
Jiang Y, Chun MM, Marks LE. Visual Marking: Selective Attention to Asynchronous Temporal Groups. Journal Of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 2002, 28: 717-730. PMID: 12075898, DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.28.3.717.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchContext effects in visual length perception: Role of ocular, retinal, and spatial location
Arieh Y, Marks L. Context effects in visual length perception: Role of ocular, retinal, and spatial location. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2002, 64: 478-492. PMID: 12049287, DOI: 10.3758/bf03194719.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1999
study of taste perception
Hettinger T, Gent J, Marks L, Frank M. study of taste perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1999, 61: 1510-1521. PMID: 10598466, DOI: 10.3758/bf03213114.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchHaptic perception of linear extent
Armstrong L, Marks L. Haptic perception of linear extent. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1999, 61: 1211-1226. PMID: 10497438, DOI: 10.3758/bf03207624.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1998
Circle size and diameter tilt: A new look at integrality and separability
Potts B, Melara R, Marks L. Circle size and diameter tilt: A new look at integrality and separability. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1998, 60: 101-112. PMID: 9503915, DOI: 10.3758/bf03211921.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1997
Differential effects of stimulus context on perceived length: Implications for the horizontal-vertical illusion
Armstrong L, Marks L. Differential effects of stimulus context on perceived length: Implications for the horizontal-vertical illusion. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1997, 59: 1200-1213. PMID: 9401455, DOI: 10.3758/bf03214208.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1995
Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: Role of stimulus difference
Ben-Artzi E, Marks L. Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: Role of stimulus difference. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1995, 57: 1151-1162. PMID: 8539090, DOI: 10.3758/bf03208371.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1993
Primacy of Dimensions in Color Perception
Melara R, Marks L, Potts B. Primacy of Dimensions in Color Perception. Journal Of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 1993, 19: 1082-1104. PMID: 8228841, DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.19.5.1082.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1992
The slippery context effect in psychophysics: Intensive, extensive, and qualitative continua
Marks L. The slippery context effect in psychophysics: Intensive, extensive, and qualitative continua. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1992, 51: 187-198. PMID: 1549437, DOI: 10.3758/bf03212243.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchOptional processes in similarity judgments
Melara R, Marks L, Lesko K. Optional processes in similarity judgments. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1992, 51: 123-133. PMID: 1549431, DOI: 10.3758/bf03212237.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1991
Reliability of magnitude matching
Marks L. Reliability of magnitude matching. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1991, 49: 31-37. PMID: 2011450, DOI: 10.3758/bf03211613.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1989
On Cross-Modal Similarity: The Perceptual Structure of Pitch, Loudness, and Brightness
Marks L. On Cross-Modal Similarity: The Perceptual Structure of Pitch, Loudness, and Brightness. Journal Of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 1989, 15: 586-602. PMID: 2527964, DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.586.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1986
On the Cross-Modal Perception of Intensity
Marks L, Szczesiul R, Ohlott P. On the Cross-Modal Perception of Intensity. Journal Of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance 1986, 12: 517-534. PMID: 2946807, DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.12.4.517.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsAuditory loudnessSone scaleCross-modal equivalenceCross-modal perceptionCross-modal differencesVisual durationAuditory durationPerceptual experienceCase of loudnessAbsolute equivalenceDifferent sensesSequential dependenciesStimulus magnitudeAbsolute matchingCross-modality matchesLoudnessIndividual variationMagnitude matchingRelative matchingSessionsVisual brightnessStimuliPerceptionJudgmentsSenses
1983
Individual differences in perceived exertion assessed by two new methods
Marks L, Borg G, Ljunggren G. Individual differences in perceived exertion assessed by two new methods. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1983, 34: 280-288. PMID: 6646971, DOI: 10.3758/bf03202957.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSimilarities And Differences Among The Senses
Marks L. Similarities And Differences Among The Senses. International Journal Of Neuroscience 1983, 19: 1-11. PMID: 6874244, DOI: 10.3109/00207458309148640.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsSensory aids