2016
Contextual Effects in Judgments of Taste Intensity: No Assimilation, Sometimes Contrast
Shepard TG, Shavit AY, Veldhuizen MG, Marks LE. Contextual Effects in Judgments of Taste Intensity: No Assimilation, Sometimes Contrast. Perception 2016, 46: 268-282. PMID: 28024444, PMCID: PMC5944861, DOI: 10.1177/0301006616686099.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsStimulus contextExperiment 1Sense modalitiesSensory modalitiesIntensity judgmentsExperiment 4Experiment 2Contextual contrastSuccessive stimuliEvidence of contrastEvidence of assimilationContextual effectsTaste intensityTest sessionsResponse scaleJudgmentsStimuliLoudnessMagnitude estimationTaste perceptionVisual analogueConsistent evidenceTaste stimuli
1998
Focused Attention and the Detectability of Weak Gustatory Stimuli: Empirical Measurement and Computer Simulationsa
MARKS L, WHEELER M. Focused Attention and the Detectability of Weak Gustatory Stimuli: Empirical Measurement and Computer Simulationsa. Annals Of The New York Academy Of Sciences 1998, 855: 645-647. PMID: 9929665, DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb10639.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsFocused attentionTest stimuliAppropriate spatial locationsForced-choice trialsAdaptive psychophysical procedureAttentional paradigmAttentional processesUnexpected stimuliAuditory signalsTwo-alternativeFirst author’s laboratoryPsychophysical procedureSpatial locationStimuliGustatory stimuliTaste stimuliWeak stimuliAttentionAnalogous effectParadigmTrialsEarly attemptsGustatory sensitivity
1989
Memory psychophysics for taste
Algom D, Marks L. Memory psychophysics for taste. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1989, 27: 257-259. DOI: 10.3758/bf03334600.Peer-Reviewed Original Research