2024
Benchmarking Emergency Physician EHR Time per Encounter Based on Patient and Clinical Factors
Iscoe M, Venkatesh A, Holland M, Krumholz H, Sheares K, Melnick E. Benchmarking Emergency Physician EHR Time per Encounter Based on Patient and Clinical Factors. JAMA Network Open 2024, 7: e2427389. PMID: 39136949, PMCID: PMC11322841, DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.27389.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedBenchmarkingElectronic Health RecordsEmergency MedicineEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysiciansTime Factors
2022
Pragmatic clinical trial design in emergency medicine: Study considerations and design types
Gettel CJ, Yiadom MYAB, Bernstein SL, Grudzen CR, Nath B, Li F, Hwang U, Hess EP, Melnick ER. Pragmatic clinical trial design in emergency medicine: Study considerations and design types. Academic Emergency Medicine 2022, 29: 1247-1257. PMID: 35475533, PMCID: PMC9790188, DOI: 10.1111/acem.14513.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPragmatic clinical trialsClinical trial designTrial designReal-world clinical practicePragmatic clinical trial designElectronic health recordsEmergency departmentClinical trialsStudy design typeClinical practiceStudy typeTrial componentsHealth recordsEmergency medicineEmergency medicine investigatorsHuman subjects concernsInvestigatorsStudy findingsStudy considerationsTrialistsTrials
2019
Tolerance of Uncertainty and the Practice of Emergency Medicine
Platts-Mills TF, Nagurney JM, Melnick ER. Tolerance of Uncertainty and the Practice of Emergency Medicine. Annals Of Emergency Medicine 2019, 75: 715-720. PMID: 31874767, PMCID: PMC7294596, DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.10.015.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2018
An appraisal of emergency medicine clinical practice guidelines: Do we agree?
Zupon A, Rothenberg C, Couturier K, Tan T, Siddiqui G, James M, Savage D, Melnick ER, Venkatesh AK. An appraisal of emergency medicine clinical practice guidelines: Do we agree? International Journal Of Clinical Practice 2018, 73: e13289. PMID: 30372798, PMCID: PMC6351191, DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.13289.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsACEP clinical policyClinical practice guidelinesStrength of recommendationsClinical policyPractice guidelinesEvidence-based emergency careAGREE II instrumentAppraisal of GuidelinesRigor of developmentAGREE II criteriaOverall qualityPrimary outcomeOverall assessmentEmergency physiciansAmerican CollegeEmergency carePublication dateClarity of presentationSecondary analysisAppraisal instrumentsMean scorePositive associationGuidelinesAppraisal itemsScores
2016
Development and Testing of Shared Decision Making Interventions for Use in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda
Melnick ER, Probst MA, Schoenfeld E, Collins SP, Breslin M, Walsh C, Kuppermann N, Dunn P, Abella BS, Boatright D, Hess EP. Development and Testing of Shared Decision Making Interventions for Use in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda. Academic Emergency Medicine 2016, 23: 1346-1353. PMID: 27457137, PMCID: PMC5145730, DOI: 10.1111/acem.13045.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsEmergency carePractice Work GroupLevel of evidenceEvidence-based toolsED settingSDM interventionsEmergency departmentPatient understandingMedical optionsDecision aidPatient engagementNominal group techniquePatientsInterventionCliniciansCareOutcomesKey domainsFacilitate conversationsGroupRisk communicationGroup techniqueCaregivers
2015
Understanding Overuse of Computed Tomography for Minor Head Injury in the Emergency Department: A Triangulated Qualitative Study
Melnick ER, Shafer K, Rodulfo N, Shi J, Hess EP, Wears RL, Qureshi RA, Post LA. Understanding Overuse of Computed Tomography for Minor Head Injury in the Emergency Department: A Triangulated Qualitative Study. Academic Emergency Medicine 2015, 22: 1474-1483. PMID: 26568523, DOI: 10.1111/acem.12824.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsMinor head injuryCanadian CT Head RuleEmergency departmentHead injuryComputed tomographyPatient expectationsUrban academic emergency departmentUse of CTCommunity emergency departmentsClinical decision ruleHigh-quality evidenceAcademic emergency departmentHealth care providersFocus groupsPatient anxietyCT useED practiceCT scanCare providersProvider confidenceED contextPatient engagementQualitative studyTriangulated qualitative studyMultidisciplinary team
2010
Delphi Consensus on the Feasibility of Translating the ACEP Clinical Policies Into Computerized Clinical Decision Support
Melnick ER, Nielson JA, Finnell JT, Bullard MJ, Cantrill SV, Cochrane DG, Halamka JD, Handler JA, Holroyd BR, Kamens D, Kho A, McClay J, Shapiro JS, Teich J, Wears RL, Patel SJ, Ward MF, Richardson LD. Delphi Consensus on the Feasibility of Translating the ACEP Clinical Policies Into Computerized Clinical Decision Support. Annals Of Emergency Medicine 2010, 56: 317-320. PMID: 20363531, DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.03.006.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsACEP clinical policyClinical practice guidelinesClinical policyPractice guidelinesClinical decision supportGuideline developmentEmergency Physicians Clinical PolicyEvidence-based practice guidelinesClinical practice guideline developmentComputerized clinical decision supportComputerized clinical decision support systemsPractice guideline developmentDelphi consensus processHealth care qualityClinical decision support systemPoint of careClinicians' decisionsAmerican CollegeDelphi consensusClinical practiceConsensus documentCare qualityPhysician practicesExpert panelConsensus process