When COVID-19 was threatening Connecticut in early 2020, state policymakers turned to leading scientists for guidance. Among those responding to the call was Yale School of Public Health Associate Professor of Biostatistics Forrest Crawford.
Crawford and a multidisciplinary team of scientists created a computer model capable of estimating potential COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, and deaths in every county in Connecticut as COVID-19 transmission progressed in the state over time. The information proved vital in helping Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont and the Connecticut Department of Public Health make informed decisions to protect the state’s 3.6 million residents.
“Forecasting these outcomes involved building a mathematical model of disease transmission that we used to learn about the dynamics of transmission across the state,” said Crawford. “We also collected a new kind of data to monitor social distancing behavior using mobile device data.”
Called a contact metric, the new data leveraged people’s mobile device location information to measure interpersonal contact. In order to protect people’s privacy, all personal identifying information was removed from the passively collected data before it was provided to the researchers. Previously, scientists relied on other mobility metrics such as the distance people traveled or the amount of time they spent away from home to estimate interpersonal contact rates. The new contact metric substantially improved the model’s accuracy in predicting infections in Connecticut, Crawford said.
The research team believes the contact metric created for their COVID-19 study could be applied in other research investigating the transmission dynamics of a disease.
“We have focused in this study on the U.S. state of Connecticut, but the usefulness of anonymized and passively collected contact data could be generalized to other settings,” the researchers wrote in their study.
Crawford is part of the Public Health Modeling Unit at the Yale School of Public Health, an interdisciplinary group of faculty engaged in mathematical and statistical research in biostatistics, epidemiology, and health policy.
Mathematical modeling involves synthesizing and analyzing large amounts of data to help public health professionals identify effective interventions and strategies to address complex public health issues. Creating mathematical models and then applying them through computer simulation and analysis is a practical means of assembling and analyzing public health data in situations where more traditional forms of investigation are difficult due to financial, logistical, or temporal restraints and other obstacles.
“We are pioneering a new direction for public health investigation, one that complements the more traditional approaches of observational data analysis and experimentation,” said Crawford. “By focusing on the explicit portrayal of real-world processes and deducing how intervening in those processes may affect the future health of populations, we are generating new evidence that could not otherwise be obtained.”
Crawford attributes the modeling group’s success to its broad range of scholarly disciplines and public health outlooks, including operations researchers, economists, epidemiologists, doctors, toxicologists, biostatisticians, evolutionary biologists, and decision scientists.
“Our greatest strength is our people: their dedication, interests, and expertise,” said Crawford. “We aren’t wedded to a single operational method for identifying and interpreting the complex mechanisms that drive the health of populations.”