2015
The prospective evaluation of the TB strain typing service in England: a mixed methods study
Mears J, Vynnycky E, Lord J, Borgdorff MW, Cohen T, Crisp D, Innes JA, Lilley M, Maguire H, McHugh TD, Woltmann G, Abubakar I, Sonnenberg P. The prospective evaluation of the TB strain typing service in England: a mixed methods study. Thorax 2015, 71: thoraxjnl-2014-206480. PMID: 25882538, DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-206480.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsDiagnostic delayTB incidenceTB notification ratesProportion of infectionsMycobacterium tuberculosis diagnosisFalse-positive diagnosesCost-effectiveness analysisMixed-methods evaluationStrain typingTB programsProspective evaluationNotification ratesInfection increasesTuberculosis diagnosisPositive diagnosisPublic health dataComplex interventionsIncidenceMixed-methods studyRoutine laboratoryDiagnosisHealth dataCluster investigationsTypingMethods study
2014
Prospective evaluation of a complex public health intervention: lessons from an initial and follow-up cross-sectional survey of the tuberculosis strain typing service in England
Mears J, Abubakar I, Crisp D, Maguire H, Innes JA, Lilley M, Lord J, Cohen T, Borgdorff MW, Vynnycky E, McHugh TD, Sonnenberg P. Prospective evaluation of a complex public health intervention: lessons from an initial and follow-up cross-sectional survey of the tuberculosis strain typing service in England. BMC Public Health 2014, 14: 1023. PMID: 25273511, PMCID: PMC4194411, DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1023.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAttitude of Health PersonnelBacterial Typing TechniquesClinical CompetenceCost-Benefit AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth ServicesHumansMaleMolecular EpidemiologyMycobacteriumPopulation SurveillanceProgram EvaluationProspective StudiesPublic HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesTuberculosisConceptsPublic health interventionsComplex public health interventionsCross-sectional surveyHealth interventionsNational public health interventionsStrain typingPublic health staffRepeated cross-sectional surveySignificant increaseMIRU-VNTR typingProportion of respondentsTB patientsSelf-rated knowledgeTB controlProspective evaluationMixed-method evaluationHealth staffProspective identificationMajority of respondentsService users' perceptionsMethodsAn onlineInterventionTypingFuture evaluationProfessional groups