Skip to Main Content

Climate Change and Health Seminar Series: "When Data Isn’t Enough: Health, Science, and Climate Advocacy"

March 31, 2022
  • 00:00<v ->Everyone I think we can get started.</v>
  • 00:02Today it's a very special day because today
  • 00:06the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate in the House
  • 00:09just released a Working Group II report,
  • 00:12which is focused on climate change.
  • 00:16So today we are very, very pleased
  • 00:17to have Dr. Kim Knowlton joining us.
  • 00:21Dr. Knowlton is a Senior Scientist
  • 00:24at the National Resource Defense Council.
  • 00:27She's also Assistant Professor at the Columbia University's
  • 00:30Mailman School of Public Health,
  • 00:31the department of Environmental Health Science.
  • 00:34And she has been a senior member for
  • 00:36one of the first climate health program in the country.
  • 00:40So Dr. Knowlton specialize in the
  • 00:43Human Health impact of climate change.
  • 00:46She served as the co-convening lead author
  • 00:49for the Human Health chapter
  • 00:50of the US Third National Climate Assessment,
  • 00:55as a member of the second and fourth
  • 00:57New York City Panels on Climate Change.
  • 01:00And participated in the IIPCC's fourth analytics reports.
  • 01:05Her work with the New York's Climate and Health project,
  • 01:08which you will hear about later,
  • 01:10describe some of the very first down skilled
  • 01:14global to regional climate
  • 01:15and health access modeling in the US
  • 01:18which to me is also one my,
  • 01:21the kind which inspires me
  • 01:25to do my PhD thesis on this topic.
  • 01:30So I'm very pleased to welcome Dr. Kim Knowlton.
  • 01:35<v ->Thank you, Kai.</v>
  • 01:36You are so kind and thanks to you and Mauro
  • 01:39for helping with the technology
  • 01:43and just for the invitation
  • 01:44and really everyone in the room
  • 01:46on such an auspicious news day.
  • 01:48As Kai said, it's just huge.
  • 01:51I am really honored that you are taking some time
  • 01:53to be here with me and us talking about
  • 01:57climate change and how it affects people's health,
  • 01:59certainly a topic near and dear to my heart.
  • 02:02And this is gonna be, I think a pretty personal
  • 02:07conversation with you.
  • 02:09I'm not representing, you know,
  • 02:10NRDC or Columbia University officially.
  • 02:14I'm gonna tell you some things about my personal experiences
  • 02:17in this field as Kai said.
  • 02:21From some pretty early days in the climate and
  • 02:24health world and to where I am now as a scientist advocate,
  • 02:29still at the Natural Resources Defense Council,
  • 02:32most of my time and still at Columbia,
  • 02:34but I hope that I'll talk a little bit,
  • 02:37give you a sense of my slow conversion
  • 02:39from someone who probably somewhat idealistically
  • 02:43and blindly thought data.
  • 02:45It's all about data.
  • 02:47Once I can do, or someone can do a great study
  • 02:51and just bring forward those connections
  • 02:53between climate change and health that'll be it.
  • 02:55Then we'll just march into, you know,
  • 02:57climate policy and health protections and all will be well.
  • 03:00Well, I'm a firm believer but it takes a lot more than that
  • 03:05as we all see from our experience
  • 03:07and I'm gonna try and save time at the end for
  • 03:11a lot of discussion time between us too.
  • 03:13So thank you, Mauro and Kai for keeping me honest on that.
  • 03:18So I'll give you a tidbits about what I've experienced
  • 03:21along the way as we go.
  • 03:25Most of my time now
  • 03:27is spent at the Natural Resources Defense Council,
  • 03:30an environmental not for profit
  • 03:32that was established more than 50 years ago
  • 03:35by a group of young attorneys who had the idea
  • 03:39that they would use the environment as their client.
  • 03:43Environmental law didn't even exist as a field then.
  • 03:46And we have since that time,
  • 03:47pretty much kept the same mission statement.
  • 03:50And it's a big one.
  • 03:51It's a little bit ambitious to protect the earth,
  • 03:53the wild places, the people,
  • 03:56the health of all those systems,
  • 03:57and to ensure people's right to clean and healthy air,
  • 04:01water, land and the wild.
  • 04:03So, climate change and climate policy is really...
  • 04:07If one had to pick one,
  • 04:09it would be overarching, you know, theme that we work on.
  • 04:15So, it has sure been a challenge,
  • 04:17but I'm so happy, satisfied, learn something,
  • 04:22many things every day at this advocacy organization
  • 04:27working as I do in the health frame.
  • 04:30So let's get started.
  • 04:31Next slide please.
  • 04:32So this is a representation of me
  • 04:35connecting the dots between climate change and health.
  • 04:39I started actually as a geologist, I like those big systems.
  • 04:43I loved earth systems and learning about
  • 04:46how human activities affect the earth
  • 04:50and the environment and vice versa.
  • 04:52How environmental change affects our health.
  • 04:56I was very influenced by some work I did on
  • 05:00radioactive waste management.
  • 05:02I worked at a group that was
  • 05:04kind of the counterpart of the nuclear industry.
  • 05:06We would try and find potential areas of concern
  • 05:10and license applications that
  • 05:12proposed radioactive waste sites.
  • 05:14And there were a group of activists
  • 05:17at a site we were working with in West Texas
  • 05:20who impressed me mightily with their ability to
  • 05:24link this environmental change to local health.
  • 05:28We can't have this rad waste facility here
  • 05:32because the groundwater will bring it into our town,
  • 05:34you know, the radionuclides.
  • 05:37Contamination and no, we can't have it.
  • 05:40And they were successful and powerful, small but mighty
  • 05:43and I thought that's quite interesting.
  • 05:46I would like to study that.
  • 05:47So I ended up going back to school
  • 05:51to City University in New York City
  • 05:54and then to Columbia University
  • 05:57where I got so many lucky breaks.
  • 06:01I was lucky enough to be part of the
  • 06:03New York Climate and Health Project.
  • 06:05Next slide, please.
  • 06:06I'll tell you a little bit about that.
  • 06:08This was funded by the Environmental Protection Agency's,
  • 06:13STAR grants Science To Achieve Results.
  • 06:16It was really one of the first big US-based
  • 06:20integrated assessment modeling projects
  • 06:23and kind of funding proposals.
  • 06:25So, we had global climate modelers
  • 06:28who fed their information to regional climate modelers
  • 06:31who worked with land use modelers.
  • 06:33Then there was an atmosphere chemistry model
  • 06:36that sort of used all those inputs
  • 06:38and kind of at the end of this interconnected chain
  • 06:42was the health risk assessment.
  • 06:44Dr. Patrick Kinney who was my research mentor,
  • 06:48he's now at Boston University.
  • 06:50He has been continues to be a leading light
  • 06:54in the climate and health field.
  • 06:56And he gave me lots of opportunities,
  • 06:59including when he shattered across the classroom.
  • 07:00"Hey Kim, are you still looking for a dissertation topic?"
  • 07:03I said, "Yes, I am."
  • 07:05The one that I had in mind about radioactive waste
  • 07:08was not taking shape.
  • 07:10So I jumped on board,
  • 07:12the climate and health train,
  • 07:14which in 2000 was kind of new and I jumped on forward
  • 07:18and off we went.
  • 07:20Next slide, please.
  • 07:23That job of connecting the dots between
  • 07:25climate change and our health was...
  • 07:27I mean, in the research community,
  • 07:29it was starting to grow,
  • 07:30but kind of in the community at large,
  • 07:32it was an absolutely new idea.
  • 07:34And I have to say,
  • 07:3620 years later, it still is a constant conversation,
  • 07:40not only does climate change affect the environment
  • 07:42and the Arctic and polar bears and like non-human faces.
  • 07:48It also affects people
  • 07:49and some people far, far more than others.
  • 07:52So, this is an old chestnut
  • 07:55something from a article from the "New York Times" in 2003,
  • 07:59the introduced this project that looked at the
  • 08:03New York City Tri-state area,
  • 08:0531 counties in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut,
  • 08:09and the novel thing then
  • 08:12about the New York Climate and Health project
  • 08:13was health was the driver.
  • 08:16At the end of that cascade,
  • 08:17who was going to estimate the impacts
  • 08:20to the health of people in New York city?
  • 08:23Who was gonna be specific to New York?
  • 08:25Who was gonna look into the future?
  • 08:26At the time, these were new ideas.
  • 08:28In this image you see Dr. Cynthia Rosenzweig
  • 08:32who worked at NASA GISS,
  • 08:35with Jim Hansen, who was one of the, you know,
  • 08:38like the pioneers of this whole impacts
  • 08:41in climate change field.
  • 08:44At the table you see yours truly
  • 08:45on the left and Pat Kinney
  • 08:47Cynthia again Joyce Rosenthal, who is a urban planner,
  • 08:52worked in public health.
  • 08:53So, this was like the beginning,
  • 08:55the blossoming of a really interdisciplinary team
  • 08:58or transdisciplinary.
  • 09:00Next slide, please.
  • 09:03And it was, and it still remained somewhat challenging
  • 09:06to find the space, to find the funding,
  • 09:09to find the journals,
  • 09:11to find the academic appointments.
  • 09:14That kind of foster and feed interdisciplinary work.
  • 09:17But there's been, you know,
  • 09:19lots of progress in the years in between.
  • 09:22It's been a challenge, but a good one.
  • 09:24We would meet every week for three years
  • 09:27that was the term of the NYCHP as we call it
  • 09:31every week to learn each other's jargon and language.
  • 09:35And how do you do your modeling?
  • 09:37We really had to come up with
  • 09:39over that time a shared language, a shared vocabulary,
  • 09:43so that we could put together link these models.
  • 09:46And these are some of the images from the
  • 09:50more than a dozen peer review journal papers,
  • 09:53eventually that came out of the project.
  • 09:56So it was a very rich project
  • 09:59and you can see here kind of the,
  • 10:01some of the images that represent those different sectors
  • 10:05whose climate impacts are being modeled.
  • 10:08In the upper left is I believe that's looks like from the
  • 10:15model resolution global climate change
  • 10:18that was dynamically down-scaled
  • 10:21to regional climate model temperature.
  • 10:25On the upper right you see the results
  • 10:27of the atmospheric chemistry modeling component
  • 10:31that Christian Hogrefe at the University of Albany
  • 10:34did beautiful work with his colleagues there.
  • 10:38Sort of below that the lower right is
  • 10:41a figure from a paper that I was lucky enough
  • 10:45to leave the team...
  • 10:46This is all teamwork.
  • 10:47You know, none of it is singular.
  • 10:49But it was really one of the first times
  • 10:51that people who live in a region in the US
  • 10:55could look at their county.
  • 10:56Those are counties that are kind of at outlined and say,
  • 10:59"Hey, in some future year there's gonna be
  • 11:02"an increase in premature mortality here."
  • 11:05It's gonna be how much hotter.
  • 11:06I think that this was kind of the beginning of that
  • 11:09geographic specificity that has become
  • 11:12quite a powerful way to use data.
  • 11:15And in the lower left here is some land use change modeling.
  • 11:19We look forward to the 2020s, 2050s and 2080s.
  • 11:24Next slide, please.
  • 11:25This is just a little bit of a zoom in.
  • 11:28And I know Kai that
  • 11:30you like this paper and wanted me to talk about it.
  • 11:32So here we are.
  • 11:33These show, the estimates of percent increases in summer
  • 11:38ozone related premature mortality
  • 11:41look into the 2050s relative to the 1990s baseline.
  • 11:45So here again, you just get the sense of the,
  • 11:48kind of the original in my backyard.
  • 11:51Hey, that's my county.
  • 11:52Hey, that's where my aunt Sharon lives
  • 11:54that came out of New York Climate and Health Project,
  • 11:56which I think was part of why
  • 11:59it created a foundation for other papers.
  • 12:02What we found that was that overall
  • 12:05there was a median 4.5% increased region-wide
  • 12:09by the 2050s in that ozone related pre-mature mortality.
  • 12:13Next slide, please.
  • 12:16Kai created this.
  • 12:17Thank you very much for that.
  • 12:19But it gives a sense of how the work
  • 12:24of the New York Climate Health Project
  • 12:25was useful in other papers
  • 12:28that since have gone on to go much further
  • 12:31looking at how climate change
  • 12:33affects air quality and then mortality.
  • 12:35We know that ground level ozone
  • 12:38it's a temperature and sunlight sensitive
  • 12:41formation chemistry reaction.
  • 12:43So that's part of why climate change in particular
  • 12:46will serve to, you know, other things held constant,
  • 12:50make it more challenging to meet ozone regulations
  • 12:55and will tend to increase ozone concentrations.
  • 12:58Actually, the work of Michelle Bell
  • 13:00who's one of the faculty members at Yale
  • 13:03was also really instrumental in understanding
  • 13:06this kind of regional and super regional effect.
  • 13:09She was lead author on a paper and climatic change
  • 13:13that found estimated that there will be a 68% increase
  • 13:17in ozone exceeded days by the 2050s.
  • 13:21That is days that don't meet the eight hour standard.
  • 13:24So this was some of the first times that we,
  • 13:26people really got a chance to like vibe that,
  • 13:31"Hey, in my backyard where I live
  • 13:33"climate change could affect my health."
  • 13:35Because as we know, there's 25 million people,
  • 13:37adults and children in the US that have asthma
  • 13:41ozone can be a trigger for asthma attack.
  • 13:44There's all kinds of reasons why this is important.
  • 13:47There was also a companion paper on heat.
  • 13:52And heat related premature mortality that came out
  • 13:55of the New York Climate and Health Project
  • 13:57that gave a view to, you know,
  • 13:59increases by the 2050s,
  • 14:01like a 70% increase in premature heat related mortality.
  • 14:06By the 2080s, a tripling in the New York Metro region.
  • 14:10So in a lot of ways,
  • 14:11it put ozone and air quality and heat on the
  • 14:15New York Metro, I think, you know, sites for future work.
  • 14:20Next slide, please.
  • 14:22I'm gonna transition a little bit to
  • 14:26the storytelling aspect,
  • 14:28which has been a big feature of my work at NRDC.
  • 14:34As Cynthia Rosenzweig
  • 14:37from climate and health projects said wisely,
  • 14:40she called it the four Ps at the time,
  • 14:43which meant for her that proposals, you know,
  • 14:46research proposals, lead to projects
  • 14:49which lead to papers,
  • 14:51but then they very much influence policy.
  • 14:53And I would add people
  • 14:56that you can't have those influences on policy
  • 15:00kind of flowing from the data without people
  • 15:02to make it happen.
  • 15:04And then for better or worse,
  • 15:05the another P kind of the six P is politics.
  • 15:09These are all issues of some science and health science
  • 15:13that have become as we know, so politicized
  • 15:16in the years since and to this very day.
  • 15:19So, local stories help fuel advocacy.
  • 15:22And next slide, please.
  • 15:24It's my hope, my belief that
  • 15:29with health climate change becomes very personal
  • 15:31and that it can help motivate
  • 15:33that kind of health protective advocacy.
  • 15:35I'm showing this because
  • 15:37this was a study conducted with the
  • 15:39California Department of Public Health
  • 15:41and some NRDC scientists, myself included
  • 15:45that was published in 2009
  • 15:47in Environmental Health Perspectives.
  • 15:49It was really one of the first US-based studies
  • 15:52that looked at a big heat wave and its impact,
  • 15:55not a premature mortality,
  • 15:57but a morbidity on different illnesses,
  • 16:00emergency room visits, hospitalizations in a big state.
  • 16:04This is California.
  • 16:06You can see the counties on there,
  • 16:07but these are kind of climatic zones in California.
  • 16:12There was a two week heat wave in 2006.
  • 16:15That was really intense,
  • 16:17had a really large geographic extent.
  • 16:20And what this work found was to our surprise somewhat.
  • 16:24There was a huge...
  • 16:25I mean, you expect that there would be
  • 16:27an increase in excess emergency room visits,
  • 16:31but it was enormous.
  • 16:32It was over 16,000 additional excess ER visits
  • 16:37beyond what would typically be expected
  • 16:40at that season of the year.
  • 16:43There were almost 1200 excess hospitalizations,
  • 16:47and you can see from this figure that
  • 16:50the Central Coast region was just on the Western
  • 16:52and Central Coast includes
  • 16:54the San Francisco Bay Area.
  • 16:56Well the temperatures there were not in an absolute sense,
  • 16:59the hottest temperatures on the state,
  • 17:01the relative risk was very high.
  • 17:05And that is because the population there,
  • 17:08the infrastructure, the residents
  • 17:09are not a climatized are not prepared for intense heat.
  • 17:13There's a lot of resident that don't have air conditioning.
  • 17:16So, this was an interesting study.
  • 17:19Another one that's been helpful to other people doing
  • 17:22heat morbidity work.
  • 17:24But it was also interesting because our partnership
  • 17:28with the State Department of Health was really fruitful.
  • 17:32We, as an NGO, as a nonprofit,
  • 17:35as an advocacy organization could be kinda more forward
  • 17:39and more direct with some of the messaging
  • 17:42coming out of this
  • 17:43and they had the, you know, the de-identified data,
  • 17:48the statistical analysts,
  • 17:51it was a great kind of marriage of skills
  • 17:53and I think that that is part of,
  • 17:57I mean, my message to us.
  • 17:59We all have a role in what we're trying to achieve
  • 18:01in the way of both learning and taking our learnings
  • 18:04to a wider audience both public and policy making
  • 18:08to get the heck on board
  • 18:10with more health protective climate policy.
  • 18:14Government agencies have a critical role
  • 18:17and geoscientists have a critical role,
  • 18:19you academic scientists have a critical role
  • 18:22as do lots of other people,
  • 18:24artists, writers, musicians,
  • 18:27the people, children, elders, you know, community groups,
  • 18:30we're all in this thing together.
  • 18:32So a little bit of my pitch for it takes a village,
  • 18:35but next slide please.
  • 18:38To continue on that theme of
  • 18:41like making global climate change,
  • 18:43which can be sometimes rather abstract
  • 18:46or rather, let's say abstract now
  • 18:49after the last 10 years, that for sure.
  • 18:51But it can seem rather large scale
  • 18:54and I have found in my time at NRDC
  • 18:58and working with partners there in particular,
  • 19:01that making that global story local is hugely important.
  • 19:06It brings it closer to home.
  • 19:08It reflects people's lived experience
  • 19:10from media point of view
  • 19:12because working with the media successfully
  • 19:15is important to get our science and our data
  • 19:18out into the public sphere.
  • 19:20Is great because if I do,
  • 19:22as I have with, you know, my partners and colleagues,
  • 19:24you see here in the map below,
  • 19:26which I'll talk about a little bit more,
  • 19:28we typically at NRDC use existing data sets,
  • 19:32but try to put them together in novel ways
  • 19:36that tell a health relevant story.
  • 19:38And when we do that on a national scale,
  • 19:42like the map you see here,
  • 19:44it means that news outlets and people
  • 19:47and local newspapers in every one of those counties
  • 19:50can look at the map and say,
  • 19:51"Hey, what's this story?"
  • 19:53And we work with them to try and
  • 19:55bring that local story to the fore.
  • 19:57These are two URLs for some of the websites that NRDC
  • 20:04still has that combine not only mapping tools like this,
  • 20:09but also some of the information on
  • 20:11the impacts writ large for people.
  • 20:13And there's a lot of people who haven't been introduced
  • 20:17to the connection between climate change and health.
  • 20:20We also try to show preparedness and adaptation
  • 20:24and action steps that are happening locally at the state,
  • 20:29even at the local level,
  • 20:31to give people a sense of what can do
  • 20:34and see themselves in a kind of
  • 20:35action frame in this story.
  • 20:37Next slide please.
  • 20:39While those two URLs are still current,
  • 20:42I just wanted to take a little spin down memory lane
  • 20:45for me at least and show you how the online maps evolve.
  • 20:52We've gotten a lot of very positive feedback
  • 20:54through the years.
  • 20:55It was like 2011.
  • 20:56It's been a decade little bit more.
  • 20:58Yeah, a little bit more than decades
  • 21:00since those maps first came out.
  • 21:03And this is the URL for the original site climate maps.
  • 21:08We made a large effort to bring together that statewide
  • 21:12and then county level information.
  • 21:14In that original site, we had more maps actually.
  • 21:18We had showed air quality,
  • 21:20how climate change affects environmental change
  • 21:24and then related to health outcomes for air quality,
  • 21:28extreme weather events, drought, flooding,
  • 21:32extreme heat, one infectious disease, dengue fever.
  • 21:37So we tried to put the information there.
  • 21:39Next slide please.
  • 21:41And we gave people a way to not only see the threat
  • 21:46that shows what it used to look like.
  • 21:48Our website has been streamlined by much better designers.
  • 21:52Well, you know, better designers let's say
  • 21:54certainly better than me.
  • 21:56We also blog a lot.
  • 21:57Our scientists, our policy experts blog.
  • 22:01So they were all collected on the pages.
  • 22:03Next slide please.
  • 22:05And we felt it was important to give people
  • 22:08that sense of what they can do, like preparedness actions.
  • 22:12It's just frustrating
  • 22:13and, you know, frankly can lead to a sense of,
  • 22:16you know, a lack of agency
  • 22:18to give people somewhat alarming
  • 22:21health concerning news
  • 22:22and not, you know, show a way to move their concern
  • 22:25into action and movement.
  • 22:27So we did try to do that.
  • 22:28So this is just kind of sharing with you
  • 22:32our thought process.
  • 22:33It began the map series as a poster session,
  • 22:37internal to NRDC.
  • 22:38We got a lot of feedback from our colleagues
  • 22:41and we took some time and we turned it into
  • 22:44these online maps.
  • 22:45Have since kind of maintained and sustained themselves
  • 22:49as one of the most popular of NRDCS web pages.
  • 22:52And we've gotten great feedback that they're great screening
  • 22:55tools for local planners.
  • 22:58Students have used them to inform their local work.
  • 23:01So we're glad that they met with success.
  • 23:04Next slide please.
  • 23:06And this just gives a little view
  • 23:08spin through these real fast.
  • 23:10It shows in this case,
  • 23:13this is kind of collocates ozone exceedance days.
  • 23:18Days the year that this was mapped,
  • 23:20it was 2007 when this first came out,
  • 23:23but where there's ozone exceedance days and where ragweed,
  • 23:28which is a plant that produces an arrow allogenic pollen
  • 23:32and tends to produce it in late summer, early fall.
  • 23:36Exactly the same time in much the US
  • 23:38when ozone exceedance days in the hot
  • 23:41and often still days of late summer
  • 23:44can exacerbate ozone concentrations
  • 23:46and the two conditions present a double whammy to health.
  • 23:50The more sepia-toned areas in the map
  • 23:55show where ozone exceedance days and ragweed
  • 24:00are co-located and found kind of a map of relative risks.
  • 24:05This map kind of survived through the years,
  • 24:08had a real evergreen kind of lifespan
  • 24:12because every year in the spring it's tree pollen.
  • 24:15In the summer, it's grass pollen.
  • 24:17In the fall, its ragweed,
  • 24:18and there's a lot of pollen sufferers in the country.
  • 24:22So we find that this gives us an opportunity
  • 24:25to bring up those interconnections year after year.
  • 24:28Next slide please.
  • 24:30And this is just one other example of those
  • 24:33national maps that take data sets and put them together
  • 24:36in a novel way.
  • 24:37This is the dengue fever.
  • 24:39It maps where the two mosquito species,
  • 24:43Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus
  • 24:45were at the time found in the US
  • 24:48using ArboNET dataset to map the vector.
  • 24:52And it combined that with
  • 24:54centers for disease control and prevention
  • 24:56reports of dengue fever cases.
  • 24:59Most of those admittedly were imported cases
  • 25:03from people traveling outside the US
  • 25:06becoming infected back to home
  • 25:09and developing infection and symptoms.
  • 25:11But that said,
  • 25:13it is feasible that a mosquito vector
  • 25:16could come into contact by a infected person,
  • 25:21and it could become a local transmission source.
  • 25:23And there, there is local transmission of dengue fever
  • 25:28in some areas of Texas, of Florida of Hawaii.
  • 25:32So this again was just a mapping example
  • 25:35that began a series of discussions
  • 25:38that has had a long lifetime.
  • 25:39Interestingly, the year after this came out,
  • 25:42this came out in 2009 and in 2010,
  • 25:45CDC made dengue fever a reproval illness.
  • 25:48We have to take credit for that,
  • 25:50but it's kind of indicative that the national dialogue
  • 25:54was amped up for a lot of reasons
  • 25:55around that infectious disease.
  • 25:57Next slide please.
  • 25:59So just some more URLs,
  • 26:01'cause I want you to have resources
  • 26:02when I'm here and when we're done.
  • 26:06We at NRDC put together weather detailed
  • 26:10climate health fact sheets,
  • 26:11or I think seven states.
  • 26:13Michigan is shown here.
  • 26:15We also have California, Colorado,
  • 26:17Illinois, Virginia, Washington, and Pennsylvania.
  • 26:22A lot of detail, a lot of citations
  • 26:24for people that may be doing
  • 26:25climate health work in those areas.
  • 26:28And the last link is our current URL
  • 26:33that tries to put together in one place,
  • 26:35the climate and health work.
  • 26:36And we'll be updating this soon.
  • 26:38Next slide please.
  • 26:39Okay.
  • 26:41Checking my time.
  • 26:42I'm in the bend to two other huge opportunities.
  • 26:48Huge learning experiences for me,
  • 26:51and I'll talk about them a little bit.
  • 26:53But first NCA3 National Climate Assessment.
  • 26:56The third US National Climate Assessment.
  • 26:59I was fortunate enough to work on this effort
  • 27:02as one of the co-convening lead authors
  • 27:05for the Human Health chapter.
  • 27:07This was back in kind of 2011 through 2014.
  • 27:11There has since been a fourth iteration
  • 27:14of The national Climate Assessment
  • 27:16and right now work on the fifth assessment is underway.
  • 27:20But this was a huge learning opportunity for me,
  • 27:23I'd like to network with amazing scientists
  • 27:26and see how the NCA reports come out.
  • 27:29But it was very gratifying and interesting
  • 27:32that this was the vintage of NCA
  • 27:34when the here and now message
  • 27:37really came to the fore.
  • 27:39The climate impacts on health
  • 27:40are happening here and now in the US.
  • 27:43Probably the first time
  • 27:44that's been so loud and clear.
  • 27:46Translation.
  • 27:47The whole effort was aimed to make
  • 27:50all the information in all the chapters
  • 27:52entirely digestible, not just to, you know,
  • 27:55academics or scientists working in the field,
  • 27:58but to everyone to the, you know, the public.
  • 28:01And I really respect that
  • 28:02and learned a lot from that effort.
  • 28:04And third vulnerability.
  • 28:05It was one of the first times that the differential,
  • 28:09the disparate, the inequitable vulnerability
  • 28:12of some places and people and communities,
  • 28:15the climate change really was emphasized.
  • 28:17Next slide, please.
  • 28:19This is just some reflection on that here and now
  • 28:23in the years, since that effort.
  • 28:27Sadly year after year,
  • 28:28it seems like we, you know,
  • 28:29just get more of the lived experience of climate change.
  • 28:33Years 2013 to the present, all of them
  • 28:36in the top 10 warmest years globally ever recorded.
  • 28:41The two gentlemen in the upper left
  • 28:43are members of the National Medical Association.
  • 28:46They surveyed their members down
  • 28:4886% of their survey members said
  • 28:50climate change is directly relevant to patient care.
  • 28:55I mean, the physicians, the both the public health
  • 28:57and medical communities and more and more people
  • 29:00are learning about climate change from life,
  • 29:03from experience and less so from reports
  • 29:05and academic efforts.
  • 29:07Next slide, please.
  • 29:09Something else that NCA3 and other reports
  • 29:12certainly have done is this.
  • 29:14The view on the left is under a relatively lower
  • 29:18greenhouse gas emissions scenario.
  • 29:21The one on the right under a relatively higher
  • 29:24emission scenario and kind of painting the difference
  • 29:28in this case here.
  • 29:30If you could just go back advance, that happens.
  • 29:33Thank you, thank you.
  • 29:34Giving a sense of the difference between
  • 29:37the low emission scenario
  • 29:39like three degrees Fahrenheit
  • 29:42difference between now and the hottest days of the 2090s
  • 29:46versus on the right higher emissions
  • 29:49more like a 10 degrees Fahrenheit difference
  • 29:51on the highest temperature on the hottest days.
  • 29:54Giving a sense of what we can accomplish
  • 29:56and what we can avoid by moving
  • 29:59with all haste toward cleaner energy.
  • 30:02Now, next slide please.
  • 30:04And I bet you in this course and in your work,
  • 30:09you talk a lot and we're all cognizant of, you know,
  • 30:13the elderly, the very young, economically disadvantaged,
  • 30:18many communities of color,
  • 30:20people with preexisting conditions,
  • 30:22certain locations, not equally vulnerable
  • 30:26to climate health effects.
  • 30:27The IPCC report that Kai mentioned that came out today,
  • 30:32estimates that basically half of the world's population
  • 30:36like 3.6 billion live in what they're calling hot spots.
  • 30:40You have to wonder if half of the world's lives in a hotspot
  • 30:44kind of changes the meaning of hotspot.
  • 30:47In other words,
  • 30:48billions of us are highly vulnerable and highly exposed.
  • 30:53Next slide, please.
  • 30:55I wanna mention kind of in this transition of data is great.
  • 31:00It's very rich, but what can we do with it?
  • 31:03Partnerships.
  • 31:05Taking your findings, your work, your projects,
  • 31:09your papers, your knowledge,
  • 31:12and using it to learn about the lived experience
  • 31:15about local knowledge, local expertise
  • 31:18in partnership with people, communities and groups
  • 31:22who live in some of those highly exposed
  • 31:24and vulnerable areas it's what makes the work real.
  • 31:27It can really turn the data that we have into action.
  • 31:31And I wanna share with you a story,
  • 31:33you know, my again, great fortune...
  • 31:36Next slide, please,
  • 31:37in working with NRDC and partners in Ahmedabad India,
  • 31:42a city in Western India in Gujarat state.
  • 31:45I actually see one of my dear colleagues
  • 31:48and partners from that work is here today.
  • 31:50I'm very glad Dr. Pavian.
  • 31:54In 2010, this city experienced
  • 31:57what was for Ahmedabad's historic heat wave.
  • 32:00This is a news report that there were
  • 32:02over 50 people who had died but...
  • 32:05Next slide please.
  • 32:06It turns out that upon further investigation
  • 32:10among this partner team with the local experts
  • 32:13and health scientists and researchers and NRDC researchers,
  • 32:18it was more like over 1300 excess deaths
  • 32:22in the month that the heat wave occurred.
  • 32:25This graphic became known as the graph
  • 32:27because it told a story graphically
  • 32:30that had great meaning and motivated
  • 32:36the Ahmedabad municipal corporation leadership,
  • 32:39fantastic leadership from the city, just who said no more.
  • 32:43This peak that one can see in the red,
  • 32:47upper line of a peak with maximum temperature,
  • 32:52that's maximum temperature peak,
  • 32:54right below a daily death counts.
  • 32:57Then Mayor said no more.
  • 32:58I do not want this to happen again to,
  • 33:01you know, the people of Ahmedabad.
  • 33:02So next slide, please.
  • 33:05The city, the leadership at our great partners,
  • 33:08Indian Institute of Public Health in Gandhinagar,
  • 33:12NRDC other experts help the city put together
  • 33:15a heat action plan.
  • 33:16Then first, all of South Asia
  • 33:19with an early warning system with outreach
  • 33:21to the most heat vulnerable communities
  • 33:24with extra like dialogue with health professionals,
  • 33:28with outreach to the media,
  • 33:30and it really changed the whole kind of equation,
  • 33:33dynamic appreciation of heat.
  • 33:36Extreme heat as an approachable public health issue
  • 33:39that and we can do something about it.
  • 33:41Next slide, please.
  • 33:44The people of Ahmedabad as well as city leadership
  • 33:47took this issue and made it their own.
  • 33:49This shows women and people having a parade
  • 33:53to the streets of the city to raise awareness.
  • 33:57On the right you see city leaders putting rooftops white
  • 34:03to be more reflective and reduce indoor temperatures.
  • 34:05Next slide please.
  • 34:07And actually we were able to conduct an evaluation
  • 34:10of the work in Ahmedabad and found that there were
  • 34:13in the years after the launch
  • 34:15of the heat action plan in 2013.
  • 34:18And the years after the city avoided 1100 premature deaths.
  • 34:24Not strictly heat related,
  • 34:26but the deaths in there in the summer heat season
  • 34:29were reduced dramatically.
  • 34:32Could be a host of different reasons,
  • 34:35but surely the heat action plan factored into that
  • 34:38and that was published in journal environmental
  • 34:42and public health. Dr. Jeremy Hess
  • 34:45was the lead author on that.
  • 34:48Next slide please.
  • 34:49I'm rounding the bend.
  • 34:51And I want to say thank you to Ahmedabad as always
  • 34:56our partners there
  • 34:58for that amazing work which continues
  • 35:00both in terms of extreme heat
  • 35:02and now we're working on air pollution as well.
  • 35:05But to bring our climate and health work
  • 35:08and data back home,
  • 35:09this is an appreciation of the health related costs
  • 35:12of climate change.
  • 35:13You could definitely say
  • 35:14we're already paying for climate change with our health.
  • 35:16Next slide, please.
  • 35:18In 2011, NRDC lucky to work on this work,
  • 35:23took the first look from already published reports papers
  • 35:28on kinds of events that are
  • 35:32going to increase in the future
  • 35:33in intensity and duration and frequency
  • 35:36with climate change, climate sensitive events
  • 35:39and health outcomes related to them.
  • 35:41Heat wave, wildfire seasons, hurricane seasons.
  • 35:46You can see kind of the array across the US.
  • 35:49And in that first study, we found,
  • 35:52we were surprised to find $14 billion
  • 35:54in health-related costs, just from six
  • 35:57those events that were documented.
  • 35:59Surely those are not the only six
  • 36:01such events that occurred in that time,
  • 36:04but we lack integrated databases
  • 36:07that give an ability to discern the whole fabric
  • 36:11of climate sensitive events.
  • 36:12Next slide please.
  • 36:14But this interest in valuation continued strongly
  • 36:18with this report and the Fourth National Climate Assessment.
  • 36:22Next slide please.
  • 36:23And my NRDC colleague, Dr. Vijay Limaye
  • 36:28just advance it a couple times, if you don't mind please.
  • 36:31And we will see that Dr. Limaye looked at
  • 36:35just one year, 2012.
  • 36:37Again, looked through the literature to document events.
  • 36:40This was 10 different events and came up with
  • 36:44$10 billion in health related costs typically unassigned.
  • 36:49Health costs are not included when you hear
  • 36:51about Noah's billion dollar disaster tally.
  • 36:55Next slide.
  • 36:57This is really important information
  • 36:58for us to keep in mind
  • 37:00that there will be over 37,000 encounters
  • 37:05related to those climate sensitive events
  • 37:07with these kind of costs.
  • 37:09And 2/3 of the illness costs being paid
  • 37:12for Medicare and Medicaid encounters.
  • 37:14These kind of realities need to be factored in
  • 37:17when at least for me when I hear people say
  • 37:20it's gonna be so expensive to make that leap
  • 37:23to greener and cleaner energy.
  • 37:25We have to put health into the picture.
  • 37:28Next slide, please.
  • 37:29I know I'm a little over, but we're almost done.
  • 37:32I don't know if you've had Dr. Ed Maibach
  • 37:36from George Mason University come and speak with you,
  • 37:39but he is a real leader and has been
  • 37:43for a while in this climate and health messaging.
  • 37:46Along with that your colleagues
  • 37:48at Yale University, for sure.
  • 37:49But Ed Maibach has a way of putting it like this.
  • 37:52It's, you know, five messages,
  • 37:55experts agree, climate change it's real, it's us
  • 37:59it's anthropogenic, it bad yes.
  • 38:02The more we learn, the more sobered we are
  • 38:05by the impacts and their effects on people's health.
  • 38:10But these are solvable issues.
  • 38:13Next slide please.
  • 38:15But they're solvable when we take our knowledge
  • 38:19and our outrage perhaps the knowledge we learn,
  • 38:23and we determine that we're gonna protect the people,
  • 38:27the places that we care about and the people and places
  • 38:31that we can't even see perhaps
  • 38:35because it is, we are a global community.
  • 38:38There is no doubt.
  • 38:40And when we protect the most vulnerable,
  • 38:43those who are on the front lines of, you know,
  • 38:45suffering the worst impacts, when we go first to them,
  • 38:49we learn a great deal.
  • 38:51We help them, you know, most imminently
  • 38:54we help ourselves to build that healthier
  • 38:56and more secure future.
  • 38:59That data is really about
  • 39:00because if data doesn't help us connect with each other
  • 39:04and connect to the, like the last doc,
  • 39:07which is, I don't want my children,
  • 39:10my grandchildren to live in a science fiction.
  • 39:13I wanna give them like a future, you know,
  • 39:15in my small part that's worth living
  • 39:19and a current day that is, you know, worth fighting for.
  • 39:24And we're gonna do that.
  • 39:25So with that...
  • 39:26Next slide or two.
  • 39:28Thank you.
  • 39:31We'll keep our eyes open our hearts open
  • 39:34and our data streams open to learn about
  • 39:36the differential impacts of climate change
  • 39:38on our health around the globe
  • 39:40with all humility and respect and that's me.
  • 39:44And that's where you can find me
  • 39:46at that at the NRDC email.
  • 39:48I'm at Columbia, but I pick up emails
  • 39:51mostly from NRDC.
  • 39:54And we blog.
  • 39:55And now lucky me, I get a chance hopefully,
  • 39:57to listen to you and your experiences, concerns, questions.
  • 40:02So the last slide is just, you know, the question
  • 40:06but if you wanna leave the contact info up there Kai,
  • 40:09that would be fine.
  • 40:10Thank you everyone.
  • 40:11Thanks for giving me a chance
  • 40:12to talk with you and tell you my story.
  • 40:16<v ->Thank you Kim.</v>
  • 40:17Thanks for the wonderful story from your research
  • 40:21to the community engagement and to the policy.
  • 40:24So I think we can first give a round of applaud for...
  • 40:27(indistinct)
  • 40:31Well all those joining online
  • 40:33if you do have questions,
  • 40:34please feel free to post your question in the chat box.
  • 40:38But Yiqun has already gathered
  • 40:41a lot of question from our students.
  • 40:44Our students read some of the readings materials you sent,
  • 40:47and I think I summarize some into big categories.
  • 40:51So the very first question many students are having is that
  • 40:56you showed your 2011 paper on the cost
  • 40:59of the health impact climate change,
  • 41:02and also Dr.
  • 41:03One at the 2019 GeoHealth paper.
  • 41:09<v ->Yeah.</v>
  • 41:10<v ->And the students are wondering, like,</v>
  • 41:11we know this message is important,
  • 41:15but have you been surprised at all
  • 41:20with how your data has been used
  • 41:23or by who has been citing it?
  • 41:25And do you see any impact from using your paper
  • 41:29in politics or in implementation?
  • 41:36<v ->I will give a few examples.</v>
  • 41:38And I think that the headline is yes.
  • 41:43Yes it's starting.
  • 41:46I could tell.
  • 41:47First, I'll answer the question
  • 41:48then maybe I'll go back to the genesis
  • 41:51of the health cost work.
  • 41:53Yes, from almost the start when (indistinct)
  • 41:56Dr. Limaye in particular, because
  • 42:00frankly the 2019, the GeoHealth paper that you have
  • 42:03both the paper and the back sheet from
  • 42:07Dr. Vijay did a really interesting analysis
  • 42:10that got to a lot more of the particulars.
  • 42:14And we found that in among the 10 sites
  • 42:16that were the case studies,
  • 42:20there was interest from some like governor's offices
  • 42:23and some of the states.
  • 42:25We heard the paper referenced in congressional hearings
  • 42:29on climate and health topics.
  • 42:33The earlier 2011, that first work,
  • 42:36the NRDC worked on with health economists
  • 42:40at University of California.
  • 42:42That was cited recently in an amicus brief.
  • 42:47That is, you know, when friends of the court get together
  • 42:50and put together evidence that supports their side.
  • 42:53That was cited in support of, you know,
  • 42:56kind of the previous court findings
  • 43:02kind of asserting and I'm sorry, EPAs
  • 43:06ability to regulate greenhouse gases.
  • 43:08It was cited there.
  • 43:10It got both of the valuation studies
  • 43:13got quite a lot of press at the time.
  • 43:17So between media and those mentions in state
  • 43:23and federal level hearings,
  • 43:25I wouldn't say that, you know,
  • 43:27legislation has not been based on them.
  • 43:30It's not always like a law or a regulation per se,
  • 43:34but just to see the work used
  • 43:38in a policy building framework is very satisfying.
  • 43:45And you know, I think that for any of us,
  • 43:48when we see our science kind of move out of the ivory tower
  • 43:52or off the bookshelf and into, you know,
  • 43:55movement toward action, that's great.
  • 43:59That's why only speaking personally, that's why I do this.
  • 44:02And I don't even expect that it's gonna happen,
  • 44:05but when it does, it feels good.
  • 44:09<v ->Excellent.</v>
  • 44:10Here comes a relatively more technical question
  • 44:13regarding how you actually calculated the, you know,
  • 44:17economic burden of this cost.
  • 44:19So the students are not very familiar with,
  • 44:22for example, the statistical life lost.
  • 44:25And they're wondering, like, for example,
  • 44:27they understand if you have the Hurricane Sandy,
  • 44:30you can calculate the health damages.
  • 44:33But they're not quite sure
  • 44:34about how you calculate for example,
  • 44:36let's see the ozone pollution.
  • 44:38The ozone air pollution in Nevada.
  • 44:40So how do you, you know,
  • 44:42calculate the cost associated with this mobility
  • 44:45and the mortality?
  • 44:49<v ->I'll try to do a decent job,</v>
  • 44:51just noting that Dr. Limaye could do an awesome job
  • 44:54because he knows the insight and the method,
  • 44:59but to your two,
  • 45:01I mean the two main components
  • 45:03of the valuation assignment are the
  • 45:06mortality and the morbidity.
  • 45:08The mortality, the value of a statistical life
  • 45:12is the basis for that cost assignment.
  • 45:18We've had a lot of discussion,
  • 45:19a lot of questions about what that means.
  • 45:22It's then wide use the environmental protection agency,
  • 45:25for example, has used it for many years.
  • 45:27It kind of evolves.
  • 45:29It is not a statement about the value,
  • 45:32the inherent value of life.
  • 45:34It's comprised of kind of looking at again statistically,
  • 45:40a large group of people and the,
  • 45:42what people would pay to avoid risk of death
  • 45:46across you know, a large and you know, millions of people,
  • 45:51and then assigning that.
  • 45:52So it's way of assigning
  • 45:58willingness to pay to avoid death.
  • 46:01That may not have helped much, but just to be clear,
  • 46:06it's not a statement of life value.
  • 46:08For the morbidity,
  • 46:09for the emergency room visits, hospitalizations,
  • 46:13the outpatient, visits, home healthcare medications.
  • 46:18There are two fantastic databases,
  • 46:22Healthcare Utilization Project HCUP,
  • 46:25and the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey MEPS
  • 46:29that were used to take
  • 46:33the already tabulated health outcomes.
  • 46:36We used already existing reports,
  • 46:39either published literature or state or federal reports.
  • 46:43Excuse me.
  • 46:45And then to assign a value to
  • 46:50the cost related to treatment care
  • 46:56in those different categories.
  • 46:58So we're using kind of national data sets
  • 47:01to assign appropriate costs,
  • 47:04to what was already documented,
  • 47:06and then adding those costs together
  • 47:09and trying to always use and apply a consistent methodology.
  • 47:14If you look in the GeoHealth paper at table four,
  • 47:18it gives you a sense of the different types of costs
  • 47:23that go into the totals for the different locations
  • 47:28and different health outcomes.
  • 47:31So I recommend if that wasn't entirely satisfying,
  • 47:34check out table four in the GeoHealth paper.
  • 47:38But those are great questions.
  • 47:40I mean, we could have a whole,
  • 47:42or maybe do want to have a whole session with Dr. Limaye
  • 47:46to dig in 'cause it's fascinating.
  • 47:47And of course, methodological work is evolving all the time.
  • 47:54It showed us very clearly the great value
  • 47:59of having inter...
  • 48:01Or let's say our goal
  • 48:03to advocate for more integrated climate health
  • 48:08and cost data sets because we had to
  • 48:12spend quite a bit of time and effort
  • 48:15to assemble the different data sets used to
  • 48:18eventually assign those costs.
  • 48:21I hope that helped a bit.
  • 48:22<v ->That helps a lot.</v>
  • 48:23Thank you, Kim.
  • 48:25We do have a question from online audience from Leo.
  • 48:31The question as we saw in the US and world wide
  • 48:34directly related to the shutdowns and closures we made
  • 48:37at the start of the pandemic,
  • 48:40the pollution level was dropped.
  • 48:41So how do we get back on track
  • 48:44with those gains that we have now lost?
  • 48:49<v ->And the reference...</v>
  • 48:50And this is a question just to be clear,
  • 48:53the fact that emissions are rising again
  • 48:56after the diminishment owing to
  • 49:00relating to the economic shutdown
  • 49:03and like diminished transportation travel economic activity.
  • 49:08How do we get back on track?
  • 49:12Well, we've seen the kind of reductions
  • 49:17that are possible not to in any way minimize
  • 49:21the journey that, and you know, the suffering,
  • 49:24the loss that people have been through,
  • 49:27continue to be through with the pandemic,
  • 49:31not to equate the two in any way,
  • 49:33but I think we, with everything that's happening right now,
  • 49:37the realization of that climate impacts
  • 49:41associated air pollution,
  • 49:43associated flooding heat related mortality and morbidity
  • 49:47are just accelerating.
  • 49:50There simply must be a commitment,
  • 49:52a demand to move toward cleaner energy systems
  • 49:57whereby no matter what is happening,
  • 50:00we can support robust economic activity and not be polluting
  • 50:05and creating the health harms today
  • 50:09and the climate related harms in future.
  • 50:11I think if anything, you know,
  • 50:14it sobers us as to how vulnerable
  • 50:19we are as a global society to a pandemic.
  • 50:23How differential the vulnerabilities are.
  • 50:25How we have to pay attention to the inequities,
  • 50:28but we simply have to invest and demand
  • 50:31cleaner energy now.
  • 50:33there is no time to wait.
  • 50:37<v ->What a powerful message.</v>
  • 50:37Thank you Kim.
  • 50:39As you know, like our students at the MPH students
  • 50:45and the master students in other schools.
  • 50:47So they're wonder like for public health students,
  • 50:51if they're interested in this field,
  • 50:53I want to, you know, make it do intent
  • 50:56or at future career plans.
  • 50:58So what kind of skills do you think that the students
  • 51:02are currently to liking or maybe
  • 51:04is best for them to help
  • 51:06in order to be successful in this field?
  • 51:10<v ->Well, first good, great.</v>
  • 51:13Keep your interest alive.
  • 51:14We need you.
  • 51:15We need you at the field.
  • 51:16The world needs you so badly.
  • 51:19Please continue.
  • 51:21You know, with every week, with every month, every year,
  • 51:24the need is greater.
  • 51:25So good for you, I applaud you.
  • 51:29MPH students continue your basic,
  • 51:31you know, skill building.
  • 51:33I mean, epidemiology, statistics, you know,
  • 51:37environmental health, social sciences, all of it.
  • 51:43It's foundational.
  • 51:44Two communication.
  • 51:47Building communication skills, writing more.
  • 51:52Is there an outlet where
  • 51:53you can, you know, blog or write essays
  • 51:56or you know, write, write, write,
  • 51:58and listen, listen, listen.
  • 52:01Talk with other people.
  • 52:03Talk with, you know, use every opportunity
  • 52:05to hone your own speaking and listening skills
  • 52:10because the amount of information and learning
  • 52:13and studies that are coming out
  • 52:17it's like a gusher right now.
  • 52:19But keep at it and make common cause.
  • 52:22Find a group, local group, community group, citizens group,
  • 52:28student group join in with other student,
  • 52:31do not let your yourself get to the point where
  • 52:34you have a sense of being alone.
  • 52:36Like the news is so sober rank,
  • 52:38the latest science, the data is so sober rank.
  • 52:42Don't get to the point where you feel like
  • 52:44you're working alone in a bell jar.
  • 52:46You are not.
  • 52:47There are, you know, hundreds of millions likely
  • 52:50people around the world.
  • 52:51Maybe more in be interesting to have someone try
  • 52:54and assign that sometime,
  • 52:56but you're part of a huge community
  • 52:59and we all have to have each other's backs,
  • 53:01but we all have to keep kind of bolstering one another.
  • 53:06And you know, having a good outlet for our outrage
  • 53:10and turning it into action,
  • 53:12making it move so that we're, you know, not burdened.
  • 53:16Not laid down in our work.
  • 53:18And keep doing your work.
  • 53:19Be the best scientist and the most involved person
  • 53:23that you can be.
  • 53:25And you'll have skills of plenty
  • 53:28and people will come and find you.
  • 53:31But it helps when you go and look yourself
  • 53:34and make common cause.
  • 53:37(indistinct)
  • 53:38<v ->I think we do have a not question,</v>
  • 53:40but a commenter from the Chan saying that
  • 53:44the importance of now looking by professional reservations
  • 53:47is also suggested like the students should be members
  • 53:50of the APHA.
  • 53:53<v ->Yes, the American Public Health Association</v>
  • 53:56has been great on climate change and health
  • 54:00a few years back, not too many.
  • 54:02I think it was 2017.
  • 54:04Climate change was the annual meeting theme.
  • 54:08And they have student groups.
  • 54:12This is all, you know,
  • 54:14it's really important to stay connected locally.
  • 54:17Find a local community group.
  • 54:18Ask what can you do?
  • 54:20How can you learn from them?
  • 54:23How can you serve them?
  • 54:24You've got skills.
  • 54:25I mean, face it.
  • 54:26Even if you're, you know, in your student hood,
  • 54:30you're gaining skills, use them.
  • 54:34Yeah.
  • 54:36<v ->Thanks Kim.</v>
  • 54:37A kind of related question to that is
  • 54:40you have been doing a lot of work
  • 54:41on the science communications to the general public.
  • 54:44So the students are wondering, you know,
  • 54:46we do a lot of academic work,
  • 54:48we know the science.
  • 54:50But how can we better communicate
  • 54:53this connection between climate change of health
  • 54:55and economy costs to their general public?
  • 54:59<v ->Oh, well I mean, I could put in a plug for, you know,</v>
  • 55:03please stay tuned at NRDC via
  • 55:07the URLs I showed you before.
  • 55:10www.nrdc.org, but specific to the valuation work,
  • 55:15it is our intention to keep that going.
  • 55:19And with you know, new partners and new applications,
  • 55:21because we're really interested in having a hand
  • 55:25doing what we can to help
  • 55:26build that sense of the larger fabric.
  • 55:29Like the whole fabric
  • 55:31of what are the climate sensitive events
  • 55:34and climate sensitive health outcomes
  • 55:37that climate change is fueling.
  • 55:39Right now we've got like six one year
  • 55:41and 10 another year.
  • 55:43Like little great spots on a map
  • 55:45that are lit up because there's data and information there.
  • 55:49But if we're going to have you know,
  • 55:51an appreciation of who do we serve
  • 55:55with preparedness and adaptation
  • 55:57and funding and support first,
  • 55:58we need a more complete picture so there's that.
  • 56:02There's also, it occurs to me the at Mailman
  • 56:06School of Public Health,
  • 56:08they have put together have organized a global consortium
  • 56:12made up of over 250 health profession schools.
  • 56:16Yale school of public health is a member.
  • 56:19It's called the Global Consortium
  • 56:21on Climate and Health Education.
  • 56:23Dr. Cecilia Sorensen at Mailman is the director now.
  • 56:28And they're doing a fantastic job
  • 56:31of putting information content trainings, networking
  • 56:37through their website.
  • 56:39And because you're a member at Yale School of Public Health,
  • 56:43I'm sure that there is opportunity to enrich that
  • 56:47and participate in groups like The Consortium,
  • 56:50as well as these other membership groups there.
  • 56:53And all of those groups would be only too happy to
  • 56:56have you help them learn and then do
  • 57:00about climate and health communication.
  • 57:01I guess the last pitch on that is,
  • 57:04it definitely needs to be a part
  • 57:06of the climate and health training.
  • 57:08This communication piece.
  • 57:10I don't think that we scientists should have to do
  • 57:13a turn at a place like NRDC,
  • 57:16where I very fortunate to work with a very, you know,
  • 57:21enriched and experienced communications group.
  • 57:27But we all need to have that training
  • 57:29and learn from one another.
  • 57:31So put it in the curriculum.
  • 57:32Maybe that's a conversation you can have
  • 57:36with your faculty and administration.
  • 57:38It wouldn't hurt.
  • 57:40<v ->Thanks Kim.</v>
  • 57:41And we can have, like...
  • 57:45I feel like we can have another hour discussion
  • 57:47on all these topics,
  • 57:48but unfortunately we have another class right after this.
  • 57:52So we have to end the discussion today,
  • 57:55but just to remind everyone that
  • 57:57the recordings of this lecture will be online.
  • 58:00So, yeah.
  • 58:03<v ->I'm sorry, Kai.</v>
  • 58:04I didn't mean to interrupt,
  • 58:04but thank you for the opportunity.
  • 58:06And I did have one last question,
  • 58:08tell you what it's about a resource.
  • 58:10I don't know if people know about
  • 58:12the Climate Change and Human Health Literature Portal,
  • 58:15which NIEHS put together and it's a compendium
  • 58:19of lots of climate and health literature.
  • 58:22I'll be sure to give you the link
  • 58:25so that you can distribute it among
  • 58:28the folks who are here today.
  • 58:29'Cause it's a resource that's online
  • 58:31and although it's a couple years kind of behind the current,
  • 58:34it's very it's very good.
  • 58:36So.
  • 58:37<v ->Yeah, thank you Kim.</v>
  • 58:38<v ->Thank you for everything you've given me</v>
  • 58:40with your questions.
  • 58:41It's very nourishing to me.
  • 58:43So I thank you for that everyone
  • 58:45and good luck with your work.
  • 58:47<v ->Thank you Kim.</v>