1997
Breast Cancer Risk Factors According to Combined Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Status: A Case-Control Analysis
Yoo K, Tajima K, Miura S, Takeuchi T, Hirose K, Risch H, Dubrow R. Breast Cancer Risk Factors According to Combined Estrogen and Progesterone Receptor Status: A Case-Control Analysis. American Journal Of Epidemiology 1997, 146: 307-314. PMID: 9270409, DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009271.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedOdds RatioReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneReproductive HistoryRisk FactorsConceptsProgesterone receptor statusHormone receptor statusReceptor statusEstrogen receptor statusRisk factorsBreast cancerAichi Cancer Center HospitalBreast cancer risk factorsDiagnosis/interviewReproductive risk factorsCancer Center HospitalCancer risk factorsGradient of riskBreast cancer casesCase-control analysisPolytomous logistic regressionCancer-free controlsCommon control groupStratification of casesJoint estrogenCenter HospitalMenstrual regularityCigarette smokingCombined EstrogenProgesterone receptor
1993
A hospital-based case-control study of breast-cancer risk factors by estrogen and progesterone receptor status
Yoo K, Tajima K, Miura S, Yoshida M, Murai H, Kuroishi T, Lee Y, Risch H, Dubrow R. A hospital-based case-control study of breast-cancer risk factors by estrogen and progesterone receptor status. Cancer Causes & Control 1993, 4: 39-44. PMID: 8431529, DOI: 10.1007/bf00051712.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdultBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMiddle AgedReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRisk FactorsConceptsHospital-based case-control studyBreast cancer risk factorsProgesterone receptor statusCase-control studyEstrogen receptorRisk factorsBreast cancerPR statusReceptor statusPR-negative breast cancerER-negative breast cancerFull-term pregnancyPR-negative casesBreast cancer casesCancer-free controlsSignificant differencesER statusMenstrual regularityEtiologic distinctionsBorderline differenceNegative casesCancerStatusAgePercent