2023
The Scholarly and Pedagogical Benefits of the Legal Laboratory: Lessons from the Consortium for the Advanced Study of Brain Injury at Yale Law School.
Shapiro Z, Deb C, Lawrence C, Golden A, Wright M, Kraschel K, Fins J. The Scholarly and Pedagogical Benefits of the Legal Laboratory: Lessons from the Consortium for the Advanced Study of Brain Injury at Yale Law School. The Journal Of Law, Medicine & Ethics 2023, 51: 672-683. PMID: 38088597, DOI: 10.1017/jme.2023.126.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2022
Legislation restricting gender-affirming care for transgender youth: Politics eclipse healthcare
Kraschel K, Chen A, Turban J, Cohen I. Legislation restricting gender-affirming care for transgender youth: Politics eclipse healthcare. Cell Reports Medicine 2022, 3: 100719. PMID: 35977463, PMCID: PMC9418844, DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100719.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchRegulating Devices that Create Life
Kraschel K. Regulating Devices that Create Life. 2022, 203-214. DOI: 10.1017/9781108975452.016.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMedical device regulationRegulatory lawsCambridge CoreDevice regulationRegulatory concernsOpen accessPatient privacyMedical devicesSerious public healthCurrent developmentsPublic healthRegulationInnovative productsLawBookEUPrivacyMedical providersConcernControversyLatest developmentsPolicymakersStakeholdersInnovationAccessLegal Aspects of Fertility Preservation
Koller C, Kraschel K. Legal Aspects of Fertility Preservation. 2022, 641-658. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-47767-7_47.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchKey legal challengesLegal challengesLegal entitiesLegal infrastructureLegal aspectsRegulatory questionsRegulatory issuesLack of uniformitySubsequent thawRegulatory systemReproductive materialFinal dispositionLawInformed consentQuestionsStark differencesInsurance coverageFertility clinicsPartiesConsentStateWorld of artIssuesEntitiesWarning
2020
Which Legal Approaches Help Limit Harms to Patients From Clinicians' Conscience-Based Refusals?
Kogan R, Kraschel K, Haupt C. Which Legal Approaches Help Limit Harms to Patients From Clinicians' Conscience-Based Refusals? The AMA Journal Of Ethic 2020, 22: e209-216. PMID: 32220267, DOI: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.209.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchUnderstanding the Role of Law in Reducing Firearm Injury through Clinical Interventions
Shultz BN, Lye CT, D'Onofrio G, Gluck AR, Miller J, Kraschel KL, Ranney ML. Understanding the Role of Law in Reducing Firearm Injury through Clinical Interventions. The Journal Of Law, Medicine & Ethics 2020, 48: 146-154. PMID: 33404303, DOI: 10.1177/1073110520979416.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsFirearm injuriesRole of lawFront-line healthcare providersFirearm injury preventionCourt orderInvoluntary holdFirearm policiesLawPublic health crisisPatient counselingInjury reportingInjury preventionClinical practiceClinical scenariosHealthcare providersUnintended consequencesClinical interventionsPhysician practicesInjuryUnited StatesHealth crisisPhysiciansRegulationPracticeHarm
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply