2014
Implicit and explicit weight bias in a national sample of 4,732 medical students: The medical student CHANGES study
Phelan S, Dovidio J, Puhl R, Burgess D, Nelson D, Yeazel M, Hardeman R, Perry S, van Ryn M. Implicit and explicit weight bias in a national sample of 4,732 medical students: The medical student CHANGES study. Obesity 2014, 22: 1201-1208. PMID: 24375989, PMCID: PMC3968216, DOI: 10.1002/oby.20687.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsExplicit weight biasWeight biasExplicit biasAnti-Fat Attitudes TestMedical Student CHANGE StudyImplicit Association TestImplicit weight biasImplications of biasesStudent factorsNational sampleExplicit attitudesLarge national sampleWeight biasesBias scoresAttitudes TestRacial minoritiesAssociation TestLongitudinal studyFeeling thermometerYear medical studentsFuture researchMedical studentsTest interventionsBiasesStudents
2011
Group Status Drives Majority and Minority Integration Preferences
Hehman E, Gaertner S, Dovidio J, Mania E, Guerra R, Wilson D, Friel B. Group Status Drives Majority and Minority Integration Preferences. Psychological Science 2011, 23: 46-52. PMID: 22173737, DOI: 10.1177/0956797611423547.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
2010
Stereotype Threat and Health Disparities: What Medical Educators and Future Physicians Need to Know
Burgess D, Warren J, Phelan S, Dovidio J, van Ryn M. Stereotype Threat and Health Disparities: What Medical Educators and Future Physicians Need to Know. Journal Of General Internal Medicine 2010, 25: 169-177. PMID: 20352514, PMCID: PMC2847106, DOI: 10.1007/s11606-009-1221-4.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAttitude of Health PersonnelFaculty, MedicalForecastingHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMinority GroupsPhysiciansStereotyping
2009
The Irony of Harmony
Saguy T, Tausch N, Dovidio J, Pratto F. The Irony of Harmony. Psychological Science 2009, 20: 114-121. PMID: 19152543, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02261.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPositive intergroup contactIntergroup contactPositive contactIntergroup inequalityIntergroup tensionsStudy 1Study 2Members' perceptionsSocial changePerceptionActions of membersGroup behaviorPerceptions of JewsAdvantaged groupsIsraeli ArabsParticipantsExperimental groupExpectationsDisadvantaged groupsSupportIntergroup differencesAttitudesInterventionImplicationsCommonalities
2008
The Fragility of Intergroup Relations
Pearson A, West T, Dovidio J, Powers S, Buck R, Henning R. The Fragility of Intergroup Relations. Psychological Science 2008, 19: 1272-1279. PMID: 19121137, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02236.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIntergroup contactIntergroup interactionsPositive intergroup contactIntergroup relationsIntergroup communicationGreater anxietyDyadic conversationsLess anxietyDelay conditionsTemporal disruptionReal-time conversationsAnxietyPractical implicationsEthnic majorityAudiovisual feedbackLatino participantsDyadsSocial dynamicsConversationMinority groupsLess interestDisengagementIntergroupParticipantsDynamic process
2003
Effect of Social Category Priming on Personal Attitudes
Kawakami K, Dovidio J, Dijksterhuis A. Effect of Social Category Priming on Personal Attitudes. Psychological Science 2003, 14: 315-319. PMID: 12807403, DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.14451.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsAdolescentAdultAttitudeFemaleHumansMaleMinority GroupsPrejudiceSocial IdentificationSocial PerceptionStereotypingStudents