2022
Unpacking all-inclusive superordinate categories: Comparing correlates and consequences of global citizenship and human identities
Carmona M, Guerra R, Dovidio J, Hofhuis J, Sindic D. Unpacking all-inclusive superordinate categories: Comparing correlates and consequences of global citizenship and human identities. Frontiers In Psychology 2022, 13: 986075. PMID: 36160563, PMCID: PMC9491308, DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986075.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchInclusive superordinate categorySuperordinate categoryBehavioral outcomesDifferent psychological processesAutonomy-oriented helpRelative ingroup prototypicalityDependency-oriented helpPrevious researchPsychological processesHigh entitativityIngroup prototypicalityCorrelational studySalienceEssentialist perceptionsPrototypicalityHuman identityNational groupsDifferent representationsControl categoriesEntitativityRepresentationInterchangeable useDifferent labelsDifferent categoriesIntergroup
2016
The Common Ingroup Identity Model and the Development of a Functional Perspective: A Cross-National Collaboration
Gaertner S, Guerra R, Rebelo M, Dovidio J, Hehman E, Deegan M. The Common Ingroup Identity Model and the Development of a Functional Perspective: A Cross-National Collaboration. 2016, 105-120. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42727-0_5.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCommon ingroup identity modelIdentity modelOne-group representationMinority group membersMembers of majorityGroup members' preferencesGroup distinctivenessFunctional perspectiveGroup goalsIdentity representationMinority groupsGroup membersMajority groupDual identityGroup disparitiesMembers' preferencesOne-groupSubgroup identificationCollective actionRepresentationFunctional approachAttentionPreferencesPrejudiceDistinctiveness
2014
A shared dual identity promotes a cardiovascular challenge response during interethnic interactions
Scheepers D, Saguy T, Dovidio J, Gaertner S. A shared dual identity promotes a cardiovascular challenge response during interethnic interactions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2014, 17: 324-341. DOI: 10.1177/1368430213517271.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDual identityIdentity representationEthnic majority group membersDual-identity approachNative Dutch participantsSocial identity factorsEthnic minority group membersMajority group membersMinority group membersIntergroup threatIntergroup relationsMotivational stateDutch participantsCardiovascular arousalDifferent ethnic subgroupsBiopsychosocial modelCollaborative tasksIdentity factorsInterethnic interactionDutch nationalityInteraction partnersOne-groupTaskCardiovascular indicesRepresentation
2013
Responses to Endorsement of Commonality by Ingroup and Outgroup Members: The Roles of Group Representation and Threat
Gómez Á, Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Fernández S, Vázquez A. Responses to Endorsement of Commonality by Ingroup and Outgroup Members: The Roles of Group Representation and Threat. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin 2013, 39: 419-431. PMID: 23456560, DOI: 10.1177/0146167213475366.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsOne-group representationPositive intergroup orientationsIntergroup orientationsOutgroup membersCommon identityIngroup membersSymbolic threatExperiment 1Experiment 2Positive orientationIngroupSocial normsEndorsementRepresentationIdentityOrientationThreatMembersCommonalitiesGroup representationsNorms
2010
How should intergroup contact be structured to reduce bias among majority and minority group children?
Guerra R, Rebelo M, Monteiro M, Riek B, Mania E, Gaertner S, Dovidio J. How should intergroup contact be structured to reduce bias among majority and minority group children? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 2010, 13: 445-460. DOI: 10.1177/1368430209355651.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMinority group childrenIntergroup biasOutgroup childrenOutgroup membersProcess of generalizationGroup goalsGroup childrenGroup identityMajority groupDual identityPositive attitudesOutgroupOne-groupFunctional perspectiveAttitudesChildrenAdditional analysesMinority groupsBiasIdentitySessionsGoalRepresentationPerspective
2008
Approaching math increases math=me and math=pleasant
Kawakami K, Steele J, Cifa C, Phills C, Dovidio J. Approaching math increases math=me and math=pleasant. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology 2008, 44: 818-825. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMajority and Minority Perspectives in Intergroup Relations: The Role of Contact, Group Representations, Threat, and Trust in Intergroup Conflict and Reconciliation
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, John M, Halabi S, Saguy T, Pearson A, Riek B. Majority and Minority Perspectives in Intergroup Relations: The Role of Contact, Group Representations, Threat, and Trust in Intergroup Conflict and Reconciliation. 2008, 227-254. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195300314.003.0011.Peer-Reviewed Original Research
1999
Reducing Prejudice
Dovidio J, Gaertner S. Reducing Prejudice. Current Directions In Psychological Science 1999, 8: 101-105. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.00024.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup contactBasis of prejudiceNegative emotional statesIntergroup strategiesEmotional statesContemporary prejudiceIndividualized perceptionsGroup boundariesPrejudiceIntentional formsFavorable attitudesSuch inconsistenciesContemporary formsPerceptionAttitudesDifferent groupsIndividualsInconsistenciesTraditional formsInterventionPeopleRepresentationGroupMembersStrategiesReducing Intergroup Bias: Elements of Intergroup Cooperation
Gaertner S, Dovidio J, Rust M, Nier J, Banker B, Ward C, Mottola G, Houlette M. Reducing Intergroup Bias: Elements of Intergroup Cooperation. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology 1999, 76: 388-402. PMID: 10101876, DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.388.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsIntergroup cooperationGroup identity modelCommon fateOut-group membersIntergroup biasM. HewstoneFacial reactionsSeparable contributionsIdentity modelSuperordinate entityEvaluative ratingsParticipants' representationsManipulation of interactionsReduced biasBiasHewstoneDecategorizationRepresentationRatingsManipulationMembershipInteractionPrimary setCooperationMediators
1998
Intergroup Bias: Status, Differentiation, and a Common In-Group Identity
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Validzic A. Intergroup Bias: Status, Differentiation, and a Common In-Group Identity. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology 1998, 75: 109-120. PMID: 9686453, DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.109.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsCommon In-Group IdentityPositive intergroup contactGroup identity modelPresent researchIntergroup biasM. HewstoneIntergroup contactTask performanceIdentity modelTask dimensionsTheoretical integrationLaboratory groupsHewstoneBiasTaskResearchInterventionGroup representationsRepresentationFindingsIdentityExpertiseA Social Psychology of National and International Group Relations
Dovidio J, Maruyama G, Alexander M. A Social Psychology of National and International Group Relations. Journal Of Social Issues 1998, 54: 831-846. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01251.x.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup relationsSocial psychological analysisNature of perceptionIntergroup factorsSocial psychologyIntergroup conflictSocial psychologistsPsychological analysisConflict resolutionGroup relationsBehavioral responsesPerceptionPractical contributionsPsychologyPsychologistsConcluding articleRelationConflictGroup representationsRepresentationFrameworkResponsibility
1997
Extending the Benefits of Recategorization: Evaluations, Self-Disclosure, and Helping
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Validzic A, Matoka K, Johnson B, Frazier S. Extending the Benefits of Recategorization: Evaluations, Self-Disclosure, and Helping. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology 1997, 33: 401-420. PMID: 9247370, DOI: 10.1006/jesp.1997.1327.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup biasCommon ingroup identity modelIntergroup contact situationsOne-group representationThree-person groupsIntergroup behaviorEvaluative biasIdentity modelSelf-DisclosureGroup membersRecategorizationPresent researchStrong impressionParticipantsBiasContact situationsSeparate groupsRepresentationFavoritismSingle groupRatingsDifferent groupsImpressionMembersGroup
1995
Group Representations and Intergroup Bias: Positive Affect, Similarity, and Group Size
Dovidio J, Gaertner S, Isen A, Lowrance R. Group Representations and Intergroup Bias: Positive Affect, Similarity, and Group Size. Personality And Social Psychology Bulletin 1995, 21: 856-865. DOI: 10.1177/0146167295218009.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup biasPositive affectOut-group evaluationGroup identity modelIntergroup relationsSocial categorizationAffective factorsApplied implicationsIdentity modelSuperordinate groupAffectSocial representationsRepresentationGroup representationsBiasLow levelsCategorizationGroup sizeImplicationsSubjectsMembershipGroup
1994
The Contact Hypothesis
Gaertner S, Rust M, Dovidio J, Bachman B, Anastasio P. The Contact Hypothesis. Small Group Research 1994, 25: 224-249. DOI: 10.1177/1046496494252005.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCognitive representationsAffective reactionsContact hypothesisCommon ingroup identity modelIntergroup biasIdentity modelCooperative interdependenceWeak representationRacial identityEgalitarian normsHigh schoolSurvey studyEqual statusRepresentationBiasSchoolsIngroupFavorabilityAmerican identityThefeaturesHypothesisIdentityStudent bodyDifferent groupsStudents
1990
How Does Cooperation Reduce Intergroup Bias?
Gaertner S, Mann J, Dovidio J, Murrell A, Pomare M. How Does Cooperation Reduce Intergroup Bias? Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology 1990, 59: 692-704. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.692.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchIntergroup cooperationCognitive representationsFormer outgroup membersSocial categorization perspectiveMultiple regression mediation analysesRegression mediation analysisIntergroup biasIntergroup contactOutgroup membersMediation analysisMember representationSsRepresentationBiasAbsence of cooperationParticipantsCooperationAttractivenessGroupHypothesisPerspective
1989
Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Benefits of Recategorization
Gaertner S, Mann J, Murrell A, Dovidio J. Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Benefits of Recategorization. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology 1989, 57: 239-249. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.239.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSelf-categorization theoryIntergroup biasConceptual representationControl conditionOut-group membersIn-group membersGroup boundariesRecategorizationOne-groupSeparate individualsCategorization approachBiasRepresentationSmall groupAttractivenessDifferent waysUndergraduatesIndividualsImplicationsMembershipMembersFindingsGroupStrategiesTheory
1986
Racial stereotypes: The contents of their cognitive representations
Dovidio J, Evans N, Tyler R. Racial stereotypes: The contents of their cognitive representations. Journal Of Experimental Social Psychology 1986, 22: 22-37. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1031(86)90039-9.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSocial cognitionUse of stereotypesCognitive representationsWord characteristicsSocial categorizationPriming experimentPositive traitsObject categoriesEvaluative wordsTest stimuliInformation processingRacial attitudesPrime categoryNegative characteristicsReaction timeCognitionRacial stereotypesSocial groupsWordsStereotypesPrimesFacilitated responseRacial categoriesImportant similaritiesRepresentation
1981
Spatial representations of knowledge
Noreault T, Dovidio J. Spatial representations of knowledge. ACM SIGIR Forum 1981, 16: 113-125. DOI: 10.1145/1013228.511772.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSimilarity judgmentsSimilarity ratingsIntroductory psychology courseTerm dependence modelSocial psychologyPsychology courseTest performanceThree-week moduleSpatial representationJudgmentsCourse segmentTheoretical explanationRatingsExam scoresInformation retrieval system performancePsychologySubject knowledgeKnowledgePerformanceQuestionnaireRepresentationScoresResearchRelationshipExplanationSpatial representations of knowledge: validity and applications to information science
Noreault T, Dovidio J. Spatial representations of knowledge: validity and applications to information science. ACM SIGIR Forum 1981, 16: 113-125. DOI: 10.1145/511754.511772.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSimilarity judgmentsSimilarity ratingsIntroductory psychology courseTerm dependence modelSocial psychologyPsychology courseTest performanceThree-week moduleSpatial representationJudgmentsCourse segmentTheoretical explanationRatingsExam scoresInformation retrieval system performancePsychologySubject knowledgeKnowledgePerformanceQuestionnaireValidityRepresentationScoresResearchExplanation