2025
Gaps in U.S. livestock data are a barrier to effective environmental and disease management
Muenich R, Aryal S, Ashworth A, Bell M, Boudreau M, Cunningham S, Flynn K, Hamilton K, Liu T, Mashtare M, Nelson N, Rashid B, Saha A, Schaffer-Smith D, Showalter C, Tchamdja A, Thompson J. Gaps in U.S. livestock data are a barrier to effective environmental and disease management. Environmental Research Letters 2025, 20: 031001. PMID: 39944271, PMCID: PMC11811603, DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/adb050.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCoarse spatiotemporal scalesHuman health concernsSignificant data gapsGreenhouse gas emissionsLivestock dataPollution mitigationAir pollutionLocal scaleMonitoring disease outbreaksWaste emissionsZoonotic disease outbreaksNational scaleSpatiotemporal scalesData gapsGas emissionsLivestock operationsAquifer depletionDisease outbreaksLivestockPollutionRemote-sensingData availabilityResistance genesNational Agricultural Statistics ServiceFood systems
2003
The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in the integrated assessment of climate change: implications for IA practitioners
Bell M, Hobbs B, Ellis H. The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in the integrated assessment of climate change: implications for IA practitioners. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 2003, 37: 289-316. DOI: 10.1016/s0038-0121(02)00047-2.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchValue judgmentsIntegrated assessmentUnderstanding of tradeoffsGreenhouse gas emissionsInterest ratesPolicy tradeoffsHypothetical policyClimate change expertsEnergy policyMCDM methodsGas emissionsUncertainty caseCriteria decision making methodMulti-criteria decision-making methodTypes of impactsPolicyIA practitionersChange expertsClimate changeKey resultsDecision-making methodImpactFuture impactTradeoffImplications
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply