Which Legal Approaches Help Limit Harms to Patients From Clinicians' Conscience-Based Refusals?
Kogan R, Kraschel K, Haupt C. Which Legal Approaches Help Limit Harms to Patients From Clinicians' Conscience-Based Refusals? The AMA Journal Of Ethic 2020, 22: e209-216. PMID: 32220267, DOI: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.209.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchMeSH KeywordsConscienceEthics, MedicalHumansLegislation, MedicalOrganizationsPhysiciansRefusal to TreatThe “Rules of the Road”: Ethics, Firearms, and the Physician's “Lane”
Shultz BN, Tolchin B, Kraschel KL. The “Rules of the Road”: Ethics, Firearms, and the Physician's “Lane”. The Journal Of Law, Medicine & Ethics 2020, 48: 142-145. PMID: 33404307, DOI: 10.1177/1073110520979415.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchConceptsPrimary obligationAgency relationshipPhysician's primary obligationPrinciples of beneficenceGeneral beneficenceMedical ethicsMoral idealsEthical obligationBeneficencePublic advocacyBurden of healthcareEthicsFundamental principlesObligationsPhysician involvementViolencePrinciplesNonmaleficenceIdealAutonomySocietyAdvocacyGun violencePhysiciansSystematic definition
This site is protected by hCaptcha and its Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply